↓ Skip to main content

Annals for Internal Medicine

Dual Health Care System Use and High-Risk Prescribing in Patients With Dementia: A National Cohort Study.

Overview of attention for article published in ACP Journal Club, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
40 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Dual Health Care System Use and High-Risk Prescribing in Patients With Dementia: A National Cohort Study.
Published in
ACP Journal Club, December 2016
DOI 10.7326/m16-0551
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua M Thorpe, Carolyn T Thorpe, Walid F Gellad, Chester B Good, Joseph T Hanlon, Maria K Mor, John R Pleis, Loren J Schleiden, Courtney Harold Van Houtven

Abstract

Recent federal policy changes attempt to expand veterans' access to providers outside the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Receipt of prescription medications across unconnected systems of care may increase the risk for unsafe prescribing, particularly in persons with dementia. To investigate the association between dual health care system use and potentially unsafe medication (PUM) prescribing. Retrospective cohort study. National VA outpatient care facilities in 2010. 75 829 veterans with dementia who were continuously enrolled in Medicare from 2007 to 2010; 80% were VA-only users, and 20% were VA-Medicare Part D (dual) users. Augmented inverse propensity weighting was used to estimate the effect of dual-system versus VA-only prescribing on 4 indicators of PUM prescribing in 2010: any exposure to Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) high-risk medication in older adults (PUM-HEDIS), any daily exposure to prescriptions with a cumulative Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) score of 3 or higher (PUM-ACB), any antipsychotic prescription (PUM-antipsychotic), and any PUM exposure (any-PUM). The annual number of days of each PUM exposure was also examined. Compared with VA-only users, dual users had more than double the odds of exposure to any-PUM (odds ratio [OR], 2.2 [95% CI, 2.2 to 2.3]), PUM-HEDIS (OR, 2.4 [CI, 2.2 to 2.8]), and PUM-ACB (OR, 2.1 [CI, 2.0 to 2.2]). The odds of PUM-antipsychotic exposure were also greater in dual users (OR, 1.5 [CI, 1.4 to 1.6]). Dual users had an adjusted average of 44.1 additional days of any-PUM exposure (CI, 37.2 to 45.0 days). Observational study design of veteran outpatients only. Among veterans with dementia, rates of PUM prescribing are significantly higher among dual-system users than with VA-only users. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Other 12 15%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Psychology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 23 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 149. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2021.
All research outputs
#275,722
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from ACP Journal Club
#1,123
of 13,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,602
of 420,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACP Journal Club
#28
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.