The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy in Type 2 Diabetes: Effects on Hepatic Steatosis and Fibrosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Internal Medicine, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.7326/m21-1962 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kathrine Aglen Seeberg, Heidi Borgeraas, Dag Hofsø, Milada Cvancarova Småstuen, Nils Petter Kvan, John Olav Grimnes, Morten Lindberg, Farhat Fatima, Lars Thomas Seeberg, Rune Sandbu, Jøran Hjelmesæth, Jens Kristoffer Hertel |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 19% |
Turkey | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Paraguay | 1 | 2% |
Dominican Republic | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 34 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 27 | 56% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 29% |
Scientists | 7 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 6 | 12% |
Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Professor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 16% |
Unknown | 24 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 33% |
Linguistics | 2 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 26 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2022.
All research outputs
#422,779
of 26,378,208 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Internal Medicine
#1,563
of 13,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,285
of 531,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Internal Medicine
#34
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,378,208 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 531,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.