↓ Skip to main content

Annals for Internal Medicine

Article Metrics

Unprocessed Red Meat and Processed Meat Consumption: Dietary Guideline Recommendations From the Nutritional Recommendations (NutriRECS) Consortium

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Internal Medicine, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 12,401)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
399 Mendeley
Title
Unprocessed Red Meat and Processed Meat Consumption: Dietary Guideline Recommendations From the Nutritional Recommendations (NutriRECS) Consortium
Published in
Annals of Internal Medicine, October 2019
DOI 10.7326/m19-1621
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bradley C. Johnston, Dena Zeraatkar, Mi Ah Han, Robin W.M. Vernooij, Claudia Valli, Regina El Dib, Catherine Marshall, Patrick J. Stover, Susan Fairweather-Taitt, Grzegorz Wójcik, Faiz Bhatia, Russell de Souza, Carlos Brotons, Joerg J. Meerpohl, Chirag J. Patel, Benjamin Djulbegovic, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Malgorzata M. Bala, Gordon H. Guyatt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,192 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 399 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 62 16%
Student > Bachelor 58 15%
Student > Master 52 13%
Other 43 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 9%
Other 78 20%
Unknown 69 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 8%
Social Sciences 17 4%
Other 66 17%
Unknown 93 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4492. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2021.
All research outputs
#658
of 19,507,523 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Internal Medicine
#8
of 12,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7
of 285,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Internal Medicine
#1
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,507,523 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.