↓ Skip to main content

Annals for Internal Medicine

Article Metrics

Effectiveness of Surgical and Cotton Masks in Blocking SARS–CoV-2: A Controlled Comparison in 4 Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Internal Medicine, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 11,994)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of Surgical and Cotton Masks in Blocking SARS–CoV-2: A Controlled Comparison in 4 Patients
Published in
Annals of Internal Medicine, July 2020
DOI 10.7326/m20-1342
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seongman Bae, Min-Chul Kim, Ji Yeun Kim, Hye-Hee Cha, Joon Seo Lim, Jiwon Jung, Min-Jae Kim, Dong Kyu Oh, Mi-Kyung Lee, Seong-Ho Choi, Minki Sung, Sang-Bum Hong, Jin-Won Chung, Sung-Han Kim

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10,186 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Other 7 9%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 19 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Engineering 4 5%
Computer Science 4 5%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 25 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7199. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2021.
All research outputs
#168
of 17,061,645 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Internal Medicine
#6
of 11,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40
of 277,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Internal Medicine
#2
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,061,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.