@Irreductible https://t.co/m5DtNKfI55 a lo mejor estoy desaactualizada, pero lo de la salud (teniendo en cuenta el tipo de estilo de vida asociado al consumo de carne) no está nada claro
@FBpsy @CityZendogs Esto es al parecer lo más riguroso hasta ahora, y aunque se ha tratado de rebatir, parece que es difícil separar los hechos de los gustos personales de cada uno. https://t.co/RwyrNqXPkg
@pardodevera «On the basis of 4 systematic rev. assessing the harms & benefits associated with red meat & processed meat consumption and 1 syst. rev. assessing people's health-related values […] we suggest that individuals continue their current co
@ernesturtasun @agarzon «On the basis of 4 systematic rev. assessing the harms & benefits associated with red meat & processed meat consumption and 1 syst. rev. assessing people's health-related values […] we suggest that individuals continue their
@albertecomparte @elespanolcom Anda lee un poco. Y solo es un estudio de los muchos que hay. https://t.co/spCMWGuqzg
@agarzon «On the basis of 4 systematic rev. assessing the harms & benefits associated with red meat & processed meat consumption and 1 syst. rev. assessing people's health-related values […] we suggest that individuals continue their current consum
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
RT @bigfatsurprise: These papers are summarized in this guideline: https://t.co/uSKW0vs5ft They refer to 5 other papers that reviewed all…
RT @bigfatsurprise: These papers are summarized in this guideline: https://t.co/uSKW0vs5ft They refer to 5 other papers that reviewed all…
RT @bigfatsurprise: These papers are summarized in this guideline: https://t.co/uSKW0vs5ft They refer to 5 other papers that reviewed all…
RT @bigfatsurprise: These papers are summarized in this guideline: https://t.co/uSKW0vs5ft They refer to 5 other papers that reviewed all…
RT @bigfatsurprise: These papers are summarized in this guideline: https://t.co/uSKW0vs5ft They refer to 5 other papers that reviewed all…
RT @bigfatsurprise: These papers are summarized in this guideline: https://t.co/uSKW0vs5ft They refer to 5 other papers that reviewed all…
RT @bigfatsurprise: These papers are summarized in this guideline: https://t.co/uSKW0vs5ft They refer to 5 other papers that reviewed all…
RT @bigfatsurprise: These papers are summarized in this guideline: https://t.co/uSKW0vs5ft They refer to 5 other papers that reviewed all…
RT @bigfatsurprise: These papers are summarized in this guideline: https://t.co/uSKW0vs5ft They refer to 5 other papers that reviewed all…
RT @bigfatsurprise: These papers are summarized in this guideline: https://t.co/uSKW0vs5ft They refer to 5 other papers that reviewed all…
These papers are summarized in this guideline: https://t.co/uSKW0vs5ft They refer to 5 other papers that reviewed all the clinical trial (RCT) and observational data using the respected GRADE rating system (used by 150+ public health institutions globally
@norwichruesse @Vornerbauer @FriederikeKrick @FirnhaberSabine @HeiniHenke @HellwegBernhard @HofstetGP Das ist aber nicht so eindeutig und die DGE hat das ja schon mal 2015 wegen dem 'Klima' empfohlen. https://t.co/rWTEjkqcAR
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
Un importante meta análisis no recomendaba cambios en la dieta debido a una asociación débil y poco clarar entre consumo de carne y mortalidad o cancer https://t.co/YNcadHTwVn
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
@MistyMum2 @JoeKerr57254356 @Veganella_ @cerebralsymphoy @kirthurgan @Rev0lvingDoor @ThatTennisVegan @bongxdylan @AnimalJustice6 @TheTrueCompton @Grahanimal @_Aloominati_ @OofT74480205 From the Annals of Internal Medicine: "The panel suggests that adults c
RT @ZrnicZorica: @business Not satisfied with control worlds internet & obscene amount of money,now wants to put control of food supply in…
@alluringmilani @TheJackBly https://t.co/RZzkjsi5eP https://t.co/WuHsr5oU0i https://t.co/uzSBaDPSKV Lets talk about real science instead of random instagram posts full of emoticons and no articles
@VeganBobCat @Veganella_ @Rob_NBF There's no reason to reduce your consumption of meat. Adverse health effects don't exist. Good health effects do exist. https://t.co/RyuaYMK5PV
RT @Mangan150: 2. Meat Despite all the propaganda, vegetarians do not live longer than meat eaters. A recent review published by the Anna…
@STOPHEATHERTIME Ah, I see you've ignored one of the largest investigations into red meat consumption, which included 5 systematic reviews & found no correlation with meat consumption & cancer / disease risk. https://t.co/OpPY9PxrF0 https://t.co/o1
@Astrusie1 @thehill "we found low- to very low-certainty evidence that diets lower in unprocessed red meat may have little or no effect on the risk for major cardiometabolic outcomes and cancer mortality and incidence" https://t.co/iILByfaxVL
@MattMadore576 @Plant_proof Right, dismiss all else. Along with the fact that vegan vs omnivore studies show no benefit to heart health from basically eliminating saturated fat and meat completely. And they dairy metanalyses show no increase in heart dis
RT @CarnivoreIs: Just wanted to put these 4 metanalyses on saturated fat/ meat in one place for easy reference. 1. https://t.co/oIeaJafbM…
@REGENETARIANISM @EichstadtTilman @sethitzkan @GHGGuru @BelindaFettke @couriermail @FructoseNo @GrassBased @bigfatsurprise @LouiseStephen9 @jamescophoto @JoannaBlythman @zoeharcombe That. Plus the fact that the health argument is a non-issue. https://t.co/
RT @MyNutriWeb: 🗞️Understanding the headlines🗞️ 👉NutriRECS claimed that most people do not need to reduce or moderate how much red and proc…
🗞️Understanding the headlines🗞️ 👉NutriRECS claimed that most people do not need to reduce or moderate how much red and processed meat they eat (https://t.co/pP1ajPwREE) 🌟@RachelC_WCRF discusses the results & what their interpretations were based on👇#my
@EEddyEdwards1 @drnickgreiner @me1stVegan2nd @itsjillgardner Nutritional science has come a long way since 2005 https://t.co/lUcDS6toeh But there are still problems that need to be worked out https://t.co/YF8UXChPT3
If you eat a more plant-based diet you should by default be cutting your consumption of high sugar, fat and salt convenience food. The diversity of unprocessed produce is important for us. Plant rather than animal based protein is better for us. Did you r
@strain9000 Don't recent studies suggest that even this risk (e.g. for red meat) is overstated? https://t.co/l3ZtPfnSXL
@MegTillay @GeeWhistler There's no rigorous evidence that meat-eating causes any of these problems. Here are the most rigorous-ever reviews on red meat: https://t.co/uSKW0vs5ft I think the problems you're talking about come from the SAD diet, which is ind
@KrissBergTweets I'm biased, but I wouldn't consider most processed meat unhealthy, probably some exceptions of course. Deli meats, e.g., I eat them. Also a recent analysis found no reason not to eat processed meat https://t.co/Pm5mkbVaIc
@Carniore1 "meat causes heart disease"....nope, it doesn't, actually. Metanalyses say nope. https://t.co/tsWIJvpTXO
RT @CarnivoreIs: Just wanted to put these 4 metanalyses on saturated fat/ meat in one place for easy reference. 1. https://t.co/oIeaJafbM…
RT @gpse7en: @ProfWhelan @EUFIC Oh the irony.... from @EUFIC Meta analysis deemed the highest standard (see below) yet still with the slog…
@SirHenry_ @shadesofliz_ The literature on meat has been all over the place, cos earlier studies were observational, but recent studies debunk a lot of "knowns." Here's an example: https://t.co/jfczrCqYqK From https://t.co/SDbDp0qzGm That said, your doc
@JohnG41691251 @NickEggleton @WHO The NUTRIRECS study on meat summed up all the evidence using GRADE. Willett & Hu were part of the unreasonable backlash against that & the best they could do was to cherry-pick a few markers in your cited study. h
#MQECON3018_HE little correlation between red meat consumption & health problems. But what is an optimal diet? @kompalsinha https://t.co/tLpO24Vo9N
@svenska_yle Den här som viktar FFQs och RCTs genom #GRADE? 🤔 "The panel suggests that adults continue current unprocessed red meat consumption" Johnston et al 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u
RT @bigfatsurprise: A high-level 2019 systematic review of all data on regular and processed meats. That review found only low-certainty da…
RT @bigfatsurprise: A high-level 2019 systematic review of all data on regular and processed meats. That review found only low-certainty da…
RT @bigfatsurprise: A high-level 2019 systematic review of all data on regular and processed meats. That review found only low-certainty da…
RT @bigfatsurprise: A high-level 2019 systematic review of all data on regular and processed meats. That review found only low-certainty da…
A high-level 2019 systematic review of all data on regular and processed meats. That review found only low-certainty data to show even small effects of red or processed meats and heart disease, metabolic outcomes of mortality. https://t.co/uSKW0vs5ft
"In a large multinational prospective study, we did not find significant associations between unprocessed red meat and poultry intake and mortality or major CVD". https://t.co/8PAFJC8W9j #PURE Johnston et al. https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u .@svenska_yle Ni kanske
RT @Mangan150: 2. Meat Despite all the propaganda, vegetarians do not live longer than meat eaters. A recent review published by the Anna…
RT @Mangan150: 2. Meat Despite all the propaganda, vegetarians do not live longer than meat eaters. A recent review published by the Anna…
Supporting optimal, evidence-based dietary guidelines @valli_claudia @MontseRabassa @MalgorzataBala @PabloACoello https://t.co/4cKV27lFJz
RT @EBCPMcMaster: A controversial guideline – the first to explicitly consider patients values and preferences on the basis of a systematic…
A controversial guideline – the first to explicitly consider patients values and preferences on the basis of a systematic review – challenged accepted wisdom on red meat consumption @methodsnerd https://t.co/EBWHodGUaT https://t.co/B1uZvYY5Li
RT @fleroy1974: 21/ Last year, Guyatt & others formalized their critique by COMPREHENSIVELY looking at the evidence. When using proper st…
RT @CarnivoreIs: Just wanted to put these 4 metanalyses on saturated fat/ meat in one place for easy reference. 1. https://t.co/oIeaJafbM…
@OliCantrill @kellster51 @TFerrari21 @SamaHoole @PedantDog Based on poor evidence. Associational data and animal studies only. The better quality the evidence, the less it showed meat causes cancer. https://t.co/tsWIJvpTXO
RT @Mangan150: Many prominent members of the health establishment called for the censorship of this scientific article. https://t.co/Pm5mk…
RT @Mangan150: Many prominent members of the health establishment called for the censorship of this scientific article. https://t.co/Pm5mk…
RT @Mangan150: Many prominent members of the health establishment called for the censorship of this scientific article. https://t.co/Pm5mk…
RT @Mangan150: Many prominent members of the health establishment called for the censorship of this scientific article. https://t.co/Pm5mk…
RT @Mangan150: Many prominent members of the health establishment called for the censorship of this scientific article. https://t.co/Pm5mk…
RT @Mangan150: Many prominent members of the health establishment called for the censorship of this scientific article. https://t.co/Pm5mk…
RT @Mangan150: Many prominent members of the health establishment called for the censorship of this scientific article. https://t.co/Pm5mk…
Many prominent members of the health establishment called for the censorship of this scientific article. https://t.co/Pm5mkbVaIc
@Jc21785771 @SBakerMD And funny how the better the quality of studies,the weaker the association of poor health to red and processed meats. https://t.co/tsWIJvpTXO
Le niveau de certitude restait faible/très faible mais c'est assez normal comme ils ont utilisé GRADE (utilisé en recherche clinique) et les études observationnelles commencent au niveau de certitude faible https://t.co/NHFdZ9fyqL A noter qu'un auteur ava
Hmmmm. https://t.co/WZrmndaqbP
@DaviidMPB @gemagoldie Opionion, para mi, es algo que no se altera ante datos. En cuanto a consumo de carne, por ejemplo: https://t.co/sHe3MmN0Pq
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @gpse7en: @C_Anderson1998 @OurCompass "Red meat has no link to cancer; reports which suggest so ‘weak’. Look at listing into which they…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @StephenPiment: Unprocessed Red Meat and Processed Meat Consumption: Dietary Guideline Recommendations https://t.co/voaqfTKM2Z