RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
Unprocessed Red Meat and Processed Meat Consumption: Dietary Guideline Recommendations https://t.co/voaqfTKM2Z
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
RT @Mangan150: A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there'…
A panel of 19 doctors and scientists examined the scientific literature on red and processed meat, and concluded that there's no reason for anyone to eat less of it. https://t.co/Pm5mkbVaIc
RT @Mariogomecete: 17/02/21 https://t.co/0ASZ6uJROG
17/02/21 https://t.co/0ASZ6uJROG
@ScepticalDoctor @MyNutritionSci @whsource The evidence is weak and unconvincing, more like. I agree with the conclusions of Johnston et al - too weak to recommend against it. https://t.co/Ebgs3RvaQT
@JoannaBlythman @irTomLeyman "suggests that adults continue current unprocessed red meat consumption (weak recommendation, low-certainty evidence). Similarly, the panel suggests adults continue current processed meat consumption (weak recommendation, low-c
@ScepticalDoctor @richardbeall10 @janvyjidak @tednaiman That's not true: https://t.co/J3s4eX4GZW
RT @stefcarriere: @EspinosaRomain Visiblement, nous n’avons pas le même logiciel. https://t.co/6dJ2jRrIaH
One reliable source of information about animal source food is Johnston et al. 2019: https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u They applied GRADE, a method to emphasize less on FFQ: s, which are unreliable, and more on RCTs, which are reliable.
RT @RuaraidhP: "In assessment of causal inferences on meat and adverse health outcomes the absolute effect estimates for red meat intake we…
"In assessment of causal inferences on meat and adverse health outcomes the absolute effect estimates for red meat intake were smaller than those from dietary pattern estimates. Meat consumption is unlikely to be a causal factor of adverse health outcomes"
RT @fleroy1974: 21/ Last year, Guyatt & others formalized their critique by COMPREHENSIVELY looking at the evidence. When using proper st…
RT @fleroy1974: 21/ Last year, Guyatt & others formalized their critique by COMPREHENSIVELY looking at the evidence. When using proper st…
RT @Mangan150: 2. Meat Despite all the propaganda, vegetarians do not live longer than meat eaters. A recent review published by the Anna…
@giantgio For a review of the case against meat, I suggest this one. It amounts to "fringe hypothesis" at best. https://t.co/Ebgs3RvaQT
RT @fleroy1974: 21/ Last year, Guyatt & others formalized their critique by COMPREHENSIVELY looking at the evidence. When using proper st…
RT @Mangan150: 2. Meat Despite all the propaganda, vegetarians do not live longer than meat eaters. A recent review published by the Anna…
RT @The_Nutrivore: So yeah, the first reference is just reductionist nonsense. I crunched the numbers on your second reference, and all but…
RT @fleroy1974: 21/ Last year, Guyatt & others formalized their critique by COMPREHENSIVELY looking at the evidence. When using proper st…
RT @fleroy1974: 21/ Last year, Guyatt & others formalized their critique by COMPREHENSIVELY looking at the evidence. When using proper st…
RT @fleroy1974: 21/ Last year, Guyatt & others formalized their critique by COMPREHENSIVELY looking at the evidence. When using proper st…
RT @fleroy1974: 21/ Last year, Guyatt & others formalized their critique by COMPREHENSIVELY looking at the evidence. When using proper st…
RT @fleroy1974: 21/ Last year, Guyatt & others formalized their critique by COMPREHENSIVELY looking at the evidence. When using proper st…
21/ Last year, Guyatt & others formalized their critique by COMPREHENSIVELY looking at the evidence. When using proper standards of evidence, the case against red & processed meat looks slim (weak to very weak evidence). https://t.co/n188G7T24z
@gardlf @KariLJor @Klanderverdig Dette er sant dersom hver av de 150 variablene forklarer lite av variasjonen i levealder. Som sannsynligvis også er tilfelle med rødt kjøtt, gitt den svake evidensen man finner i randomiserte studier. https://t.co/gfcvEdw
@JohnG41691251 @Plant_proof A. Relative risk. B. It doesn't hold up in studies of elimination (Veganism) C. Metanalyses disagree. https://t.co/tsWIJvpTXO
@JohnG41691251 @Plant_proof Plus, u are happy to reject metanalyses published in prestigious journals when they don't suit your bias! https://t.co/tsWIJvpTXO
@RChrisCC @EAllen0417 Those epi studies are junk and data dependent. Queationnaires are wholly unreliable. Junk in = junk out https://t.co/3BXgIv5Ry7
RT @gpse7en: @AmyCountryside @DMDent Sure it is.... Based on 2.4mn years of evolution, we have arrived here because of meat.... https://t.…
RT @Mangan150: @saifedean @TimoSolo @TeamSteemLive @AJA_Cortes @nutrition_facts A panel of 5-star experts found that any evidence against m…
@joel27799310 @maxi_maxlo @ftorodelidia https://t.co/ME2NF5VclV Mira, yo también sé poner estudios y decir que mientes.
RT @CarnivoreIs: Just wanted to put these 4 metanalyses on saturated fat/ meat in one place for easy reference. 1. https://t.co/oIeaJafbM…
RT @CarnivoreIs: Just wanted to put these 4 metanalyses on saturated fat/ meat in one place for easy reference. 1. https://t.co/oIeaJafbM…
RT @fleroy1974: The evidence to claim that red meat causes disease is - weak https://t.co/XlmR28eua3 - not meeting causality criteria http…
@PoeBrianL @BrassVon @sickpig @SarahTaber_bww @deadalnix @GrassBased Incorrect. It's still just an association and still just associated to "riisk" and not actual mortality. Recent metanalyses say such evidence is weak and doesn't justify decreasing red me
RT @Mangan150: 2. Meat Despite all the propaganda, vegetarians do not live longer than meat eaters. A recent review published by the Anna…
@KetoCarnivore @ScepticalDoctor You mean this review? https://t.co/Ebgs3RvaQT
RT @Mangan150: 2. Meat Despite all the propaganda, vegetarians do not live longer than meat eaters. A recent review published by the Anna…
RT @Mangan150: 2. Meat Despite all the propaganda, vegetarians do not live longer than meat eaters. A recent review published by the Anna…
RT @Mangan150: 2. Meat Despite all the propaganda, vegetarians do not live longer than meat eaters. A recent review published by the Anna…
RT @Mangan150: 2. Meat Despite all the propaganda, vegetarians do not live longer than meat eaters. A recent review published by the Anna…
RT @Mangan150: 2. Meat Despite all the propaganda, vegetarians do not live longer than meat eaters. A recent review published by the Anna…
RT @Mangan150: 2. Meat Despite all the propaganda, vegetarians do not live longer than meat eaters. A recent review published by the Anna…
RT @Mangan150: 2. Meat Despite all the propaganda, vegetarians do not live longer than meat eaters. A recent review published by the Anna…
RT @Mangan150: 2. Meat Despite all the propaganda, vegetarians do not live longer than meat eaters. A recent review published by the Anna…
RT @Mangan150: 2. Meat Despite all the propaganda, vegetarians do not live longer than meat eaters. A recent review published by the Anna…
RT @Mangan150: 2. Meat Despite all the propaganda, vegetarians do not live longer than meat eaters. A recent review published by the Anna…
RT @Mangan150: 2. Meat Despite all the propaganda, vegetarians do not live longer than meat eaters. A recent review published by the Anna…
RT @Mangan150: 2. Meat Despite all the propaganda, vegetarians do not live longer than meat eaters. A recent review published by the Anna…
RT @Mangan150: 2. Meat Despite all the propaganda, vegetarians do not live longer than meat eaters. A recent review published by the Anna…
RT @Mangan150: 2. Meat Despite all the propaganda, vegetarians do not live longer than meat eaters. A recent review published by the Anna…
2. Meat Despite all the propaganda, vegetarians do not live longer than meat eaters. A recent review published by the Annals of Internal Medicine found the evidence against meat so weak that we need not change our meat-eating habits. https://t.co/Pm5mkb
@Plant_proof And metanalyses using the grade criteria say the evidence is weak for meat being any problem, that includes those rct's. Plus, where is the sat fat coming from? Cookies,? Of course you benefit not eating milkshakes and cookies https://t.co/Q
@spicycrippy @remygalan @DianaRico4D @svilardyq Eso es un resumen. Normalmente estos estudios se deben comprar para leer. Igualmente acá lo tiene. https://t.co/Q2kEgUCQns
@boiledpotato550 @PlantsGrowHere Yeah nah. Not true. But if you don’t want to eat meat that’s your choice. No need to be a dick to everyone else making their own choices. https://t.co/4M1IIG5w4R
RT @CarnivoreIs: Just wanted to put these 4 metanalyses on saturated fat/ meat in one place for easy reference. 1. https://t.co/oIeaJafbM…
RT @CarnivoreIs: Just wanted to put these 4 metanalyses on saturated fat/ meat in one place for easy reference. 1. https://t.co/oIeaJafbM…
RT @CarnivoreIs: Just wanted to put these 4 metanalyses on saturated fat/ meat in one place for easy reference. 1. https://t.co/oIeaJafbM…
@Focus_drustvo Pa še na temo NIJZ in ostalih, ki delajo škodo zdravju ljudi z demoniziranjem mesa. Pristrano in nestrokovno (papgajsko po drugih) stališče NIJZ vidim je iz 2015. Od takrat se je na tem področju zgodilo: https://t.co/o5x5nA3RBB https://t.co/
RT @CarnivoreIs: Just wanted to put these 4 metanalyses on saturated fat/ meat in one place for easy reference. 1. https://t.co/oIeaJafbM…
RT @The_Nutrivore: So yeah, the first reference is just reductionist nonsense. I crunched the numbers on your second reference, and all but…
@HenrikHindby @NestleDanmark @micminter @Nestle I de studier der arbejder med årssagsammenhæng. https://t.co/lMEmK4C73Z
@Daphi_01 @hirst_west @wallaceme Nope, you can continue trying to put me in a box to win the argument (attacking me a solid sign you're out your depth, btw) but it won't make you look any smarter. https://t.co/OYur3w7nLA What about all the bodies that arg
@WeDietitians @BiggestComeback @ahhite @Tony87505461 @fleroy1974 @awe1546 This is an interesting confirmation. You cite a study that seems to be subject to self-bias. Dieticians recommending their own diet habits can be continued. Is that how it works in y
RT @ahhite: This is why the NutriRECS meat recommendation is so powerful. It comes with an assessment of how strong the rec is & how certa…
This is why the NutriRECS meat recommendation is so powerful. It comes with an assessment of how strong the rec is & how certain the evidence is. So the public has some framework for deciding whether it applies to them & if they want to follow it.
RT @CarnivoreIs: Just wanted to put these 4 metanalyses on saturated fat/ meat in one place for easy reference. 1. https://t.co/oIeaJafbM…
@CamiloPrietoVal @apuntedelibreta Solo el ánimo constructivo de aportar a la discusión, uno que puede servir: https://t.co/LALk1fEr1q
@ajibars @teresa_hernaez Yo comentaba ayer que tenía dudas https://t.co/Cdm7jKds1F