| Title |
Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ACP Journal Club, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.7326/m20-6817 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Henning Bundgaard, Johan Skov Bundgaard, Daniel Emil Tadeusz Raaschou-Pedersen, Christian von Buchwald, Tobias Todsen, Jakob Boesgaard Norsk, Mia M. Pries-Heje, Christoffer Rasmus Vissing, Pernille B. Nielsen, Ulrik C. Winsløw, Kamille Fogh, Rasmus Hasselbalch, Jonas H. Kristensen, Anna Ringgaard, Mikkel Porsborg Andersen, Nicole Bakkegård Goecke, Ramona Trebbien, Kerstin Skovgaard, Thomas Benfield, Henrik Ullum, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Kasper Iversen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52,040 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8649 | 17% |
| France | 2971 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1555 | 3% |
| Canada | 1037 | 2% |
| Japan | 948 | 2% |
| Brazil | 837 | 2% |
| Turkey | 417 | <1% |
| Spain | 348 | <1% |
| Germany | 291 | <1% |
| Other | 3379 | 6% |
| Unknown | 31608 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49782 | 96% |
| Scientists | 868 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 799 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 388 | <1% |
| Unknown | 203 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 753 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 753 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 82 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 80 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 77 | 10% |
| Other | 54 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 7% |
| Other | 131 | 17% |
| Unknown | 279 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 175 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 3% |
| Engineering | 21 | 3% |
| Other | 157 | 21% |
| Unknown | 301 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32291. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from ACP Journal Club
#1
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1
of 526,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACP Journal Club
#1
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 526,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.