@dsimms239 @Bregisdog @Unstablesportz @_MLFootball Ok, you are officially a soft titted bitch. You would get smacked around talking like that. Hide behind your anon pfp. When you look in the mirror, you know you are a little, fat, weak pussy. There is zero
@Leeanne009 @abvolition Your friends are intelligent, no proof they work for viruses. https://t.co/EAjUQD4jQo https://t.co/ExpfTuUqqE https://t.co/V59cRFJak1
RT @Lucky17171717: @YaleSPH @meganranney @jeremyfaust What exactly changed? Q: “You’re sure of It?” Seriously? “Extremely Weak evidence” @W…
@TimothyLane @sweden_justice @BeckyJohnson222 @SCMountainGoat @crewdog1963 Also, a mask study from Denmark was published. 6,000 people in the trial. 50% wore masks, 50% didn t, randomly assigned. After one month the results showed no statistically signific
RT @rubiaconceptual: Un ensayo controlado aleatorio danés 6000 participantes, publicado Annals of Internal Medicine en 11/2020, no encontró…
RT @rubiaconceptual: Un ensayo controlado aleatorio danés 6000 participantes, publicado Annals of Internal Medicine en 11/2020, no encontró…
@Figment_Imagine @TomsTidbits @jjoque E.g.: https://t.co/i0s2AG7BM9 In this Danish RCT, mask wears saw a not stastically significant 0.3% reduction in COVID after a month (1.8% of mask wearers infected compared to 2.1% of controls). I wouldn't call a 0.3%
@VChristianus @davidzweig @kevinnbass No statistically significant difference between medical masks & N95s: https://t.co/g8cArire9K No statistically significant difference between medical masks & wearing NO masks: https://t.co/mfbH92Jvp6 h
@JamesMelville Yes, indeed. These are some of the studies, concering face coverings: https://t.co/8YYNyfRT0n https://t.co/SyCMCpFNw9 And then there were the wise words of Dr. Anders Tegnell, Sweden's leading epidemiologist
@novemberain_exe Excuse me, i do apologize for grabbing the wrong link. https://t.co/ROWIWlsORU
@Visitor51171015 @as1ap @Spicyman1980_ @DrPuerner https://t.co/ubovNfvlng Studie von mehr Masken zu weniger Infektionen. https://t.co/8j8uVgNeke Hinweis auf Reduzierung von Infektionen bei Masken zu anderen Maßnahmen (Statistische Signifikanz knapp nicht e
@MdBreathe A Danish study indicated wearing masks made little to no differnece in terms of preventing the transmission of virus particles https://t.co/SyCMCpGllH In 2007, OSHA issued advisories about masks: https://t.co/lFMUqZZLOJ
@LaMadreDeSatan Y ojo, que el otro RCT que incluye (aunque no tenga mucha potencia) lo que muestra es que no hay ninguna diferencia significativa en los 2 grupos. https://t.co/sIk6wzms1H https://t.co/X8RXxJ2Eju
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 37.RCTs Let’s look at the other large community-based RCT of masks in covid-19. The *big Danish mask trial* became one…
@chinamanblue @atrupar @RandPaul @RonJohnsonWI Here you go: No statistically significant difference between medical masks & N95s: https://t.co/g8cAriqGkc No statistically significant difference between medical masks & wearing NO masks: https:/
@ibrake4ants https://t.co/W4vugzP9yo The CDC (2/2020) https://t.co/ECKzaadupL https://t.co/9tS34lwzyy https://t.co/AjMZgtLTy6 Dr. Anders Tegnell masks give a false sense of security.
@ibrake4ants https://t.co/W4vugzP9yo https://t.co/ECKzaadupL https://t.co/9tS34lwzyy https://t.co/AjMZgtLTy6 Dr. Anders Tegnell of Sweden: masks give a false sense of security.
@toobaffled https://t.co/W4vugzP9yo The CDC in Feb 2020 https://t.co/ECKzaadupL https://t.co/9tS34lwzyy https://t.co/AjMZgtLTy6 Sweden's epidemiologist: masks give a false sense of security.
RT @CuendetV: Alors que : 8/n https://t.co/CMMQ9IDqKg
@mcfunny @VeritasEver @ettourneur @Purebloodslove @drsimonwilliams Can you open this link ? https://t.co/8otGvxs7IP
補強するのに使われるべきではないではなく結論付けるのに使われるべきでないでした失礼 ちなみにこの論文です https://t.co/cRb2WIk7Al
@mousewheel1124 @makimura0314 @noiver どうせ論文貼っても読めないから画像貼ってあげたのに https://t.co/3ZFwKyaNgy
RT @Acinonyx_3: @GoddessAnat @combatCarpincho @georgehahn That a load of bull! Is that a thumb suck fact? Real science proves you dead WRON…
RT @Acinonyx_3: @combatCarpincho @georgehahn https://t.co/gUMShYcrmB WRONG! It makes no significant difference according to the scientific…
RT @Mightyjack1: @YANxIX5JjSQy3hk @774nyannyan この論文やね。 ここにはこう書かれてるよ。 「この調査結果からマスク着用が感染防止に効果的ではないと結論付けることはできない」ってな。 https://t.co/jlFL7hKU…
またいつもの奴だよ 反マスクさん「マスクは無意味!ほら!この論文に書いてあるだろ!」 →論文を読むと「この調査結果からマスク着用が感染防止に効果的ではないと結論付けることはできない」 結局、ちゃんと文章を読めない人が反マスク・反ワクになるんだよな。 https://t.co/1XgWHoSOn3
@YANxIX5JjSQy3hk @774nyannyan この論文やね。 ここにはこう書かれてるよ。 「この調査結果からマスク着用が感染防止に効果的ではないと結論付けることはできない」ってな。 https://t.co/jlFL7hKUky https://t.co/AmPhzF18Oh
@keetmuise https://t.co/8YYNyfRT0n https://t.co/SyCMCpFNw9 The words of Dr. Anders Tegnell, Sweden's leading epidemiologist. In 2007, OSHA issued an advisory: https://t.co/lFMUqZZdZb
@maidmania_iidx @ryotaro5512 本当ですね 元の論文 https://t.co/FXUBbZDSS6 では Two-sided P values less than 0.05〜 で見ていて、ファクトチェックの該当文章は前半後半が別の話ですね 調査もマスク着用効果を調べればよかったのに、介入(サージカルマスク配布と説明)有無の効果を陽性率で見ようとして要素入れすぎです…
@CAnsermoz @MerciBonSens Ça ne marche pas ou très peu avec les autres virus respiratoires, il y avait peu de chance que ça marche avec le covid. Le premier essai randomisé dans le cadre du covid a été fait au Danemark et publié en novembre 2020: https://t.
@BeckerLabCRTD @NaWi_Berlin @Horfenn @Karl_Lauterbach Ich halte mich daran https://t.co/jVdoQvLGYk
@JonathanSarfat1 There's also the remaining question of whether you can get behavior changes without mandates. In an ideal world you could. https://t.co/JHL8JGAHc3 https://t.co/BPTYfYTWbZ [https://t.co/pqJdHLN47u https://t.co/eoOVAnueay https://t.co/wSE
病院でマクスの効果があるのは医療用マスクだからだ そしてお前らが着けてる不織布マスクはなんら進化もしてねぇから引用に古いも何もないわアホ https://t.co/kD4qQ1m8NF
@Ryouma_Koji なんかおすすめ出てきたので 1個目 URL見えん 2個目 https://t.co/fdKy3QS9cw マスク着用しない集団(デンマーク)で着用に差はなかった 3個目 https://t.co/qo2r3HN9Be 病院でマスクはめちゃくちゃ効果あったよ 引用みたらこんな感じなのでマスクは適切につけたら効果があるってことで! てか引用古っ
@dad66_debbie @elonmusk Yes. Actual STUDIES on the efficacy of masking (largely suppressed by govts/media/big tech) demonstrated ~zero impact on C19 infections but MAJOR, NEGATIVE impact on multitude of other things (education, oral health, social cohesion
@apsmunro DANMASK RCT in 2020 also tested 1-way surgicalmask use, found no stat sig difference. Placebo effect might have been less of an issue as masks were not widely promoted in Denmark at time of study. https://t.co/g4TKgVqpMH
@GidMK @apsmunro So I'm guessing you care more about the results based on testing/diagnosis from Solberg et al.? https://t.co/BPTYfYTWbZ [https://t.co/2JztTBs4Et https://t.co/ghjyPUBwjS https://t.co/wSEM7uDCQm (https://t.co/bZonxEQ5ij)] https://t.co/JHL8
@CylonSaysNo @GininaTeacup1 https://t.co/CVRgP7IG0V No statistically significant difference.
@Heal_with_Rife デンマークの論文。 → 「マスク着用の習慣がない所でマスク着用の【推奨】をしたらどうなるだろ?https://t.co/3hjc17uzDP」って観点の研究。 結論は「マスクの有無で殆ど差が出ぇへんかったけど、この研究結果では【マスクが感染防止に効果的やないと結論付けられないので】」
@GrantDenn @MustangMedicX @CBSNews It's been long known & common knowledge among the medical community that they don't stop transmission of colds (Another Coronavirus)/flu, etc. There are many studies. Even predating Covid. https://t.co/kfGX8ZOJcI http
@FreeVoice1984 @BohemianAtmosp1 Whatever way you look at it, a damp dirty (in and out of pockets etc) bacteria filled rag covering your nose and mouth isn't a good idea. Especially when there's not even proof they make a difference during surgery. https:/
@readthinkwalk @Daltmann10 Try finding out if something works, before suggesting others should comply, can't prove they make a difference in surgery 🤦 https://t.co/gMkxtxhQZn https://t.co/6Dxy8NVFt1 https://t.co/cR07fzQ6ZQ https://t.co/EAjUQD3M0Q h
@Valeria__79 @Biga17207571 @MarioMbx1900 @ilpost 2020. E' una meta analisi scarsina, alcuni dei commenti non sono proprio ottimali, non vedo stratificazioni per età. Ma lo stesso anno è uscita una revisione del Cochrane molto più comprensiva di quella. Io
@jake1791783 @stanleyblunt2 @lazyrichie @therealmissjo @thecoastguy Taking care of themselves with a dirty bacteria filled rag. Ps they don't stop viruses. https://t.co/gMkxtxhQZn https://t.co/6Dxy8NVFt1 https://t.co/cR07fzQ6ZQ https://t.co/EAjUQD3
@tomwilliams2015 @LeilaniDowding @thecoastguy Perhaps you should have checked to see if they actually make a difference before! Guess what they don't, the Cochrane library review shows, no evidence of effectiveness even in operating theatres.🤷🤦 https://t
RT @Wood_House76: Danish mask study finally published. Surgical masks did NOT protect the wearer. The hypothesis that they “protect othe…
@xandersohn @Sammyvdxx @BNE535 @chadfelixg Do you prefer the Danish or Cochrane metanalysis? Neither indicated that masks were particularly effective in the real world (vs. lab) at preventing COVID. https://t.co/ClD5m49a1B https://t.co/muN8WnaOTW
@DrAdriano86 https://t.co/nCxFsBrw9b It's studies like these that make me wonder how you get to that % If 'random masking' were this good, how would it be possible to get this data? Unless these guys have high conflict of interest
@onlythefinest07 @LiberalGenXVet @PeterSweden7 https://t.co/34QgY5STVS "The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers by more than 50%"
@t_NYC That's it...blame you neuroses on your child. And then pass that neurotic behavior on to her. Great job, dad.🙄 https://t.co/TEO0IxmXzR https://t.co/7bBPywnGq0
@pitland77 デンマークのマスク着用者におけるSARS-CoV-2感染を防ぐための他の公衆衛生対策にマスク推奨を追加することの有効性 https://t.co/BzZk5fiJXi
@Groovylicious @bete_n0ire @TheyGotSkyler @DrEricDing The Decision to Promote Community Masking was POLITICAL https://t.co/SVg7dvBj4u
@mamashottake @Facts_Matter_US @JeromeAdamsMD The Decision to Promote Community Masking was POLITICAL https://t.co/SVg7dvBQU2
@ChrisChattin @Rn_Psi @JeromeAdamsMD The Decision to Promote Community Masking was POLITICAL https://t.co/SVg7dvBQU2
@TRyanGregory The Decision to Promote Community Masking was POLITICAL https://t.co/SVg7dvBQU2
@JeromeAdamsMD The Decision to Promote Community Masking was POLITICAL https://t.co/SVg7dvBQU2
@luckytran Masking was Politically Motivated https://t.co/SVg7dvBQU2
@SP_Agent_Tim @pipkinpippa Why are you lying about the study being pointless? This study is considered the gold standard, yet it was still unable to prove masks work. There are other studies and papers like this. https://t.co/M8jNLwaBUX https://t.co/m
@lexibigforehead @therealZNO @elonmusk Here’s a randomized, controlled study demonstrating mask efficacy, or lack thereof: https://t.co/8K2VOxKsCQ
@cyntiadkins @NohaAboelataMD Community Masking was a political decision https://t.co/SVg7dvBQU2
RT @perfektworld: Chirurgische Masken bieten Träger in Studie keinen sicheren Schutz vor #SARS-CoV-2: Kopenhagen – Das Tragen einer chirur…
Chirurgische Masken bieten Träger in Studie keinen sicheren Schutz vor #SARS-CoV-2: Kopenhagen – Das Tragen einer chirurgischen Maske in der Öffentlichkeit bietet für den Träger selbst keinen sicheren Schutz - Deswegen sollten FPP3 zur Verfügung stehen!
@JeromeAdamsMD @RockyMtnFella The Masking was absolutely Politicized Remember https://t.co/SVg7dvBj4u
@JoJoFromJerz To put a figure on that you would first have to be able to measure a statistical difference in people who wore masks and social distanced. https://t.co/bwooi9BBF5 https://t.co/1ZEJvB97LN
@DailyJLee & for the record In the Past Health Agencies have never advocated for Community masking to stop transmission of viruses Not until COVID -19 https://t.co/SVg7dvBQU2
@Vasserbee @CDCDirector 🎯 you mean like Real world effectiveness??? https://t.co/fIqe8wD1zh
RT @skateyDurden: @TheChefsGardens Nope, look at the Links to the Studies, you Rèťàrd https://t.co/w9w78VqVVw https://t.co/m5AiDECTBs ht…
He's still posting the Chocrane review 😂
@TheChefsGardens Nope, look at the Links to the Studies, you Rèťàrd https://t.co/w9w78VqVVw https://t.co/m5AiDECTBs https://t.co/Tn7G25Kv5N https://t.co/X2jbongqEG https://t.co/wBoUy7Jnrw https://t.co/yaQEUvSKWl https://t.co/3U2JenAd6D https://t.co
Bekçi ve muhtarlık gereksiz ve boşa harcanan paradır. Vatandaşa faydası yok. Oy için bekçilik çıkardılar başımıza.
RT @OPTICHRlS_PRIME: @CTVCalgary PLEASE refer to credible sources: https://t.co/ArdU9gm1ii No statistically significant difference betw…
@CTVCalgary PLEASE refer to credible sources: https://t.co/ArdU9gm1ii No statistically significant difference between medical masks & N95s: https://t.co/g8cArire9K No statistically significant difference between medical masks & wearing NO m
RT @BanounHelene: Merci Pr Raoult de rappeler les observations scientifiques sur l'inutilité des masques! Aucune différence dans la prévent…
RT @BanounHelene: Le Covars (successeur du fameux Conseil Scientifique) voudrait réimposer le masque qui NE SERT À RIEN!
@HORAdeNUB_023 @HelioLuiz1302 @djabinh_a @BrendaM17725695 @PintorSoviet @julcasagrande @JanjaLula @felipeneto @edinhosilva Ok! O continente africano seguiu usando máscara. Tai um estudo que comprova a ineficácia do uso de máscara. https://t.co/RWXQ8XTybU
RT @mama_melaleuca: 内閣官房 新型コロナウイルス感染症対策 マスクの効果 マスクは布やウレタンよりも 不織布の方が効果が高いことが示されています すき間のないよう顔にフィットさせ 正しくご利用ください マスク着用の主な目的は 👉会話や咳による飛沫の飛散や吸…