@shut_up_mary @AdamMacVicar @JyotiGondek @GlobalCalgary Imagine if they trusted peer reviewed science and read this case study on the efficacy of masks alone: https://t.co/ftKXlL7Jvf

@Vesemirr @ton_metric @DrEliDavid @dieBasis_Koeln Danish study with 5000 participants https://t.co/yRLMNV4HvC

@ClayTravis N95s aren’t any good either. This guy has no idea what he’s talking about.

@KristinaRevay @DrTessaT Masks like that aren’t anymore effective. See the Danmask study which used masks which were better than N95: https://t.co/eWnAUXcOs5

@kathubjohnson @FultonCoSchools That is a review of theoreticals/speculations. They admit they have no idea what a mask worn for several hrs or on a child would do. Don't our kids deserve better? How about a randomized controlled trial... the only ones i'v

Why do aspiring politicians like @JohnRuddick2 continue to RT posts like this? My guess is to gain support from the uneducated. Read the full report! "...these findings do not provide data on the effectiveness of widespread mask-wearing in the community."

@AlejandroPotre1 @PluisPedro @RubinReport Apparently not. Masks don't work for resp viruses: They're to remind you to live in fear. Pre-covid: https://t.co/9fICv9UfCC https://t.co/eA2yoxAOFa https://t.co/wrZntJreN3 https://t.co/MozDqrMWlT Now: https:/

@5KWern @RubinReport And you don't think Fauci has an agenda? Masks are for control. They don't stop viruses: https://t.co/Azo1NP9KLp https://t.co/Pg5iqf88Dy https://t.co/CKgtRxUsUb Pre-covid: https://t.co/9fICv9UfCC https://t.co/eA2yoxAOFa https:/

@MSNBC There doesn't appear to be much datum that shows association in lowered infection rates with most mask, and also without proper mask hygiene mask can cause pneumonia. https://t.co/ra4WXPuTmE https://t.co/L3fu4zQ6pg

@Bear4594 @GlennJacobsTN @CDCgov A randomized controlled trial in Denmark found "no statistically significant" difference in those wearing masks & those who didn't. There is absolutely zero evidence that masks prevent transmission or contraction of the

@marilynmaupin @CoralSeason8 @alpha_hydrogen @benshapiro Here are studies and government data: https://t.co/RZrdxr9xDi https://t.co/Kieas037tc You won’t find reliable, peer-reviewed evidence indicating masks do anything to prevent Covid bc there is none

@PencilBloke @shvetaraju There are other studies out there as well. And, there is also the negative psychological effects - perhaps even more important. Here are some: https://t.co/yYPqu1sQSY https://t.co/2Wi7Ea18ZX https://t.co/LU85w522tR https://t.co/mub

@DrBenNeel There doesn't appear to be much datum that shows lowered infection rates with most mask, and also without proper mask hygiene mask can cause pneumonia. Is there any evidence that supports non pathogen rated mask to slow and/or stop spread? https

@iannisaifantis1 Unfortunately there doesn't appear to be much datum that shows lowered infection rates with most mask, and also without proper mask hygiene mask can cause pneumonia. https://t.co/ra4WXPMuLe https://t.co/L3fu4zyvxI

https://t.co/jscLDm03sU

RT @kynohy: @PierianSpritz @ClarkeMicah @mediareformUK Pls read & learn Danmask wt a title: 'Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation…

@meresh1974 There is RCT which is saying there is no difference... https://t.co/qhoeS3wDuZ

@ScottAdamsSays https://t.co/e0byCVg4mR

@ScottAdamsSays No. https://t.co/H68xfM4AVN. https://t.co/cdGUcehNnL.

@OzraeliAvi @RobAdam74497148 @VictoriaPolice The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers by more than 50%... https://t.co/mubC0dWuxT

RT @TaraRoss: @biomathevan @PackGang2020 @NCSUTechnician This review fails to address only controlled study of #masks/#COVID, so hard for m…

@shvetaraju The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers by more than 50%... https://t.co/mubC0dWuxT

@kevinfontenot @benshapiro https://t.co/KOTkpQvSI2

RT @vibebenfield: Now published. Read the results of the Danish mask study for yourself. https://t.co/oOeSwyLZAL #Covid_19

@biomathevan @PackGang2020 @NCSUTechnician This review fails to address only controlled study of #masks/#COVID, so hard for me to take seriously. Cherry-picking data. https://t.co/2Q8ho7ZLxA “recommendation to wear a surgical mask...did not reduce,at conv'

RT @JD28H: @biomathevan @PackGang2020 @NCSUTechnician By now anyone who says masks stop C19 should be banned for spreading misinformation.…

@biomathevan @PackGang2020 @NCSUTechnician By now anyone who says masks stop C19 should be banned for spreading misinformation. Numerous real-life studies by real scientists prove masks have no effect: https://t.co/Fc6rdBFECY https://t.co/6RvhKtHXRs And

@Soulgirl1RN @Martin95684074 @ClarkeMicah https://t.co/Bqa4tJ7WEG “Statically meaningless” is not a demonstration that makes are “useless” by the way! https://t.co/5oyShx72cN

@BobDobMr @sdfreedom21 @thissmithlife @PrezPelosi @KristiNoem Here are the results from that 2020 study. https://t.co/ozO2cQhMxa https://t.co/WGC8ee4P6W

@LloydJUnger1 @its_menieb @POTUS The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers by more than 50%... https://t.co/mubC0dWuxT

@HughDalton20 @AdamLoos12 They had no right to hold out "normalcy" from the youth ever. They had no right to do any of what they did in the name of "saving lives" even though many were destroyed by the measures. Masks don't work: https://t.co/Azo1NP9KLp

@PierianSpritz @ClarkeMicah @mediareformUK Pls read & learn Danmask wt a title: 'Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection..' The result was much lower than the authors' expectation i

@Rose77221053 @Stormfire962 @CDCgov Theoretically masks stop the spread. A lab study showing how the cloth stops the droplets are worthless. The proof lies in real world data in the form of randomised controlled trials, of which the majority of studies sho

RT @DGoing5: @enjoythesearch1 @MSmelkinsonPhD Indeed or modeling or they cherry picked the dates mostly in the summer that showed low trans…

RT @serdardirican: @ark_610 Çalışma var aslında. Maskenin etkisini göremedik diyorlar. 🤗 https://t.co/31D9fxXrkP

RT @serdardirican: @ark_610 Çalışma var aslında. Maskenin etkisini göremedik diyorlar. 🤗 https://t.co/31D9fxXrkP

RT @serdardirican: @ark_610 Çalışma var aslında. Maskenin etkisini göremedik diyorlar. 🤗 https://t.co/31D9fxXrkP

RT @serdardirican: @ark_610 Çalışma var aslında. Maskenin etkisini göremedik diyorlar. 🤗 https://t.co/31D9fxXrkP

RT @serdardirican: @ark_610 Çalışma var aslında. Maskenin etkisini göremedik diyorlar. 🤗 https://t.co/31D9fxXrkP

@ark_610 Çalışma var aslında. Maskenin etkisini göremedik diyorlar. 🤗 https://t.co/31D9fxXrkP

@DrEliDavid https://t.co/QQlacAGrnM

RT @DGoing5: @EdoajoEric Except masks don't work which anyone should know by now given the winter: https://t.co/Azo1NP9KLp https://t.co/P…

@tedlieu Conclusion: The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers by more than 50% in a community with modest infection rates... https://t.co/eTo6ZDkDvb

@ABCPolitics Why didn’t ABC ban Fauci for spreading misinformation? He is a liar and a fraud. Numerous real-life studies by real-life scientists prove masks have no impact: https://t.co/Fc6rdBFECY https://t.co/6RvhKtHXRs Real-life experience backs them

@CryptoTwitt0 @nvk @davidnexusbtc https://t.co/zkiW3NzGxn

RT @ClarkeMicah: 1/2 @jdportes . What 'false claim' did I make? The study https://t.co/jAcSvLncPW says that in a huge RCT, the difference b…

@AddConfessions @HuffPost The Danish mask study. https://t.co/fZhNQXWCHM

TLDR - Masks have little to no effect 1)https://t.co/6g89Qr58bR 2)https://t.co/t32d9jKCLO 3)https://t.co/Vjxi9l5Z5T 4)https://t.co/f5sYmiCDmV 5)https://t.co/qQ2qiXloyc 6)https://t.co/wa00C1Ud4W 7)https://t.co/5cD8n3QQeA 8)https://t.co/8QlL83GoXM 9

@POTUS https://t.co/LY0O0eCU3l

RT @GeenLid: @MayorBowser I have not seen one credible study showing masking of the general public is effective at slowing transmission. P…

@OreoBuffy5 @CuomoPrimeTime @brianstelter Follow the science 🧪 https://t.co/yHoHdqvfpy

@smarzeli @minitwitt @ItsCandy1010 @JenniferSey Here is a recent one: https://t.co/0E5geIJ4wZ

@ScottAdamsSays https://t.co/g5twG7nBW0 Masks reduce the transmission of COVID 1.24%

RT @GabinJean3: 2/n Pour les masques, l'essai contrôle randomisé danois rapportait une différence évidemment non-significative de... -0,3%…

RT @ClarkeMicah: 1/2 @jdportes . What 'false claim' did I make? The study https://t.co/jAcSvLncPW says that in a huge RCT, the difference b…

RT @ClarkeMicah: How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reporte…

RT @GeenLid: @MayorBowser I have not seen one credible study showing masking of the general public is effective at slowing transmission. P…

RT @ClarkeMicah: How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reporte…

@boulderfish @BeKind11361044 @THX1138_21 @DrAylaSays https://t.co/VcvHFoIEs8

@MomOnAMission30 @BrianSoko5 @YvetteCarrion @ChristinaPushaw https://t.co/yvXEN4sew0

@YvetteCarrion @ChristinaPushaw Here’s one done with covid in particular. https://t.co/yvXEN4sew0

https://t.co/KS2xcd1m37 Antecedentes: La evidencia observacional sugiere que el uso de mascarillas mitiga la transmisión del coronavirus del síndrome respiratorio agudo severo 2 (SARS-CoV-2). No se sabe con certeza si esta asociación observada surge a trav

RT @ClarkeMicah: How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reporte…

RT @ClarkeMicah: How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reporte…

RT @ClarkeMicah: How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reporte…

RT @ClarkeMicah: How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reporte…

RT @ClarkeMicah: How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reporte…

@LMissaster @RealMattCouch Follow the science 🧪 https://t.co/yHoHdqvfpy

RT @ClarkeMicah: How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reporte…

RT @ClarkeMicah: 1/2 @jdportes . What 'false claim' did I make? The study https://t.co/jAcSvLncPW says that in a huge RCT, the difference b…

RT @ClarkeMicah: How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reporte…

@CuckSwarm @KnightsbyBen Just go and read the study, I’m not wasting any more of my time explaining basic statistical concepts to someone who isn’t interested in hearing that he’s wrong. https://t.co/Bk0Qf5dMog

RT @ClarkeMicah: How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reporte…

RT @ClarkeMicah: How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reporte…

RT @ClarkeMicah: How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reporte…

RT @ClarkeMicah: 1/2 @jdportes . What 'false claim' did I make? The study https://t.co/jAcSvLncPW says that in a huge RCT, the difference b…

RT @ClarkeMicah: How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reporte…

@Adam_Creighton "population-based survey data" - they'll use this useless dataset to prove masks work, but require RCT to prove they don't work. And even then reject them out of hand ala Danish Mask Study https://t.co/IrjetLKwxY

RT @ClarkeMicah: How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reporte…

RT @ClarkeMicah: How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reporte…

RT @ClarkeMicah: How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reporte…

RT @ClarkeMicah: How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reporte…

RT @ClarkeMicah: How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reporte…

RT @ClarkeMicah: How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reporte…

RT @ClarkeMicah: How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reporte…

RT @ClarkeMicah: How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reporte…

RT @ClarkeMicah: How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reporte…

RT @ClarkeMicah: 1/2 @jdportes . What 'false claim' did I make? The study https://t.co/jAcSvLncPW says that in a huge RCT, the difference b…

How many times do I have to point this out? And how many times to I have to say that the UK's pro-mask media never reported the outcome of this study because it didn't suit them. Yet now (as it has come out anyway, thanks partly to me) they madly suggest i

RT @ClarkeMicah: 1/2 @jdportes . What 'false claim' did I make? The study https://t.co/jAcSvLncPW says that in a huge RCT, the difference b…

1/2 @jdportes . What 'false claim' did I make? The study https://t.co/jAcSvLncPW says that in a huge RCT, the difference between infection outcomes, between the masked and the unmasked was 'not statistically significant' (direct verbatim quotation).

RT @ret_ward: Here is @ClarkeMicah continuing to mislead people with false claims about the Danmask study. Its results were inconclusive ab…

@Bogey_Down @ClarkeMicah @DwinnersCovi This was the study in question https://t.co/kq39un7gzZ What the researchers didn't assess was risk of passing Sars-Cov-2 *on*, just risk of the individual catching the disease themselves.

RT @GabinJean3: 2/n Pour les masques, l'essai contrôle randomisé danois rapportait une différence évidemment non-significative de... -0,3%…

@LeaskyHT @ipso Here's the paper, (which he never linked btw), https://t.co/vCUy8rVqA4 , its quite obviosu what it didnt try to prove, and heres the BMJ, https://t.co/92NvoSlE2l & here's the author, https://t.co/lOW7Dhczqs, all last Nov. It really wa

@catvaxlax @ClarkeMicah Is he still referencing it FFS? Henning Bundgaard et al. Annals of Internal Medicine November 2020; doi:https://t.co/YQZ4pGFHV5

RT @GabinJean3: 2/n Pour les masques, l'essai contrôle randomisé danois rapportait une différence évidemment non-significative de... -0,3%…

RT @GabinJean3: 2/n Pour les masques, l'essai contrôle randomisé danois rapportait une différence évidemment non-significative de... -0,3%…

RT @GabinJean3: 2/n Pour les masques, l'essai contrôle randomisé danois rapportait une différence évidemment non-significative de... -0,3%…

2/n Pour les masques, l'essai contrôle randomisé danois rapportait une différence évidemment non-significative de... -0,3% d'infection en faveur du groupe porteur de masques: https://t.co/fr5C73naGP Pas très convaincant, mais je serais ravi d'être contredi