@DrTomFrieden ✅No significant difference✅ in catching #COVID19 between masked & unmasked populations in non-medical settings From #DANMASK, a randomized controlled trial (gold standard), w/4,862 ppl. https://t.co/Q67dLFQEdV

@yamada_asaemon @HalucoJK1 @goldsugar777 現実社会での現象を個人がブログに解りやすく書いたものですね。全部読んでみてくださいね。 スウェーデンのRCT https://t.co/Q3YXtjo4Jh バングラデシュRCTへのつっこみ https://t.co/jZ2zMQqPig

この画像もあっちこっちで見かけるけど… 拡散してる本人は何も知らないんだろうなぁ… これはデンマークで行われた研究で全文はこれ https://t.co/uyWUnHVniB 正しくマスクを着用出来ていない人がいたりと条件が不十分だから「これをもってマスクに効果無しとは言えない」と発表した本人が言ってる。 https://t.co/PFFNASznwW

RT @yinonw: 1/ BREAKING: The only real world covid mask study was just published in Annals of Internal Medicine concluding the infection ra…

RT @RobertFritzenk2: I never wore a surgical mask unless required by edict. Surgical, cloth https://t.co/Abb4rmi1Wx and N95 https://t.co…

I never wore a surgical mask unless required by edict. Surgical, cloth https://t.co/Abb4rmi1Wx and N95 https://t.co/AM8TPiD9SV leak and are not reliable to prevent viral transmission. Buy one rated impervious to their BL4 warfare viruses. https://t.co

@Jubilo_PR1DE その2枚目のデンマークの研究結果が3枚目の画像と同じ内容のものなんだけどね、 その研究結果の全文がこちら。 https://t.co/uyWUnHVniB この中で著者が最後に言ってることが、添付画像。 「（全員が正しく着用していたわけではなかったため）この結果を 感染を防ぐ効果が無い理由に使うべきではない」 https://t.co/bpIOz0A92d

@Awakend_Citizen あなた、以前からこのデンマークのテストだけを頑なに信じ命綱にしてますが・・・ これですよね↓ https://t.co/uyWUnHVniB 最後のほうに著者自身の言葉として こう画像のようにあるんですが。 「（この結果を）感染を減らすのに効果的ではないと結論付けるために使用するべきではありません」 https://t.co/lEG6xYluBq

China’s request

RT @RobertFritzenk2: “Medical” advice against effective treatment options resulted in deaths ⚠️Surgical masks have no reliable efficacy <3%…

RT @RobertFritzenk2: “Medical” advice against effective treatment options resulted in deaths ⚠️Surgical masks have no reliable efficacy <3%…

“Medical” advice against effective treatment options resulted in deaths ⚠️Surgical masks have no reliable efficacy <3% https://t.co/Abb4rmi1Wx ⚠️Hydroxychloroquine > efficacy than remdesivir https://t.co/teVvJDjE6U ⚠️Ivermectin > efficacy than rem

@id_conference 考えてみれば、デンマークRCTで有意差なしが出た段階でマスクがコロナに効果有は幻想と諦めるべきだったと思う。 https://t.co/mEOFepYoI2

@tshirtman @Coverlarry55 @RegisCornut @DoebZid @AnneMissteacher @phillipids @AlizeeRenault @LoisHeiblig @MinkaOceane_Dr Etude du cdc..... Financée par Fauci 🤣🤣 https://t.co/IkOzrokFPi

@snorman1776 @DrRachaelF Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 174, No 3 https://t.co/dPsC4n95D2

RT @MakingC19Waves: デンマークでの6千ランダム比較試験 (RCT)でマスク着用者と非着用者はコロナ感染率に有意差がなかったです。https://t.co/2clHX8qt8i https://t.co/IhFQr65fZf

@kimdotwho @MartijnB_81 @nzherald Yeap, and here's some more studies. https://t.co/yJHFf7dhCl https://t.co/vBnETcgtoe But Martin's in a cult. He has the reasoning capacity of a 4 year old when it comes to any evidence threatening his government manufac

RT @medpedshosp: Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Ma…

Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 174, No 3 https://t.co/uVZznaYM1Z

@TomDavidoff https://t.co/3OH6oWEUzU

"the recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers by more than 50%" https://t.co/R4FRo9qX4u

@NEJM 🧵 1/2 CDC, NIH & Fauci lied about: 1. Surgical mask efficacy https://t.co/Abb4rmi1Wx 2. + Efficacy of available treatments for Covid A. ivermectin https://t.co/kipEfjO1Jh B. HCQ https://t.co/6pleySVGNP 3. ‘COVID vaccines have 95% efficac

RT @RobertFritzenk2: 🧵 1/3 CDC, NIH & Fauci lied about: 1. Surgical mask efficacy. https://t.co/kp7qRUMLTg 2. + Efficacy of available…

RT @RobertFritzenk2: 🧵 1/3 CDC, NIH & Fauci lied about: 1. Surgical mask efficacy. https://t.co/kp7qRUMLTg 2. + Efficacy of available…

RT @RobertFritzenk2: 🧵 1/3 CDC, NIH & Fauci lied about: 1. Surgical mask efficacy. https://t.co/kp7qRUMLTg 2. + Efficacy of available…

RT @RobertFritzenk2: 🧵 1/3 CDC, NIH & Fauci lied about: 1. Surgical mask efficacy. https://t.co/kp7qRUMLTg 2. + Efficacy of available…

RT @RobertFritzenk2: 🧵 1/3 CDC, NIH & Fauci lied about: 1. Surgical mask efficacy. https://t.co/kp7qRUMLTg 2. + Efficacy of available…

🧵 1/3 CDC, NIH & Fauci lied about: 1. Surgical mask efficacy. https://t.co/kp7qRUMLTg 2. + Efficacy of available treatments for Covid A. ivermectin https://t.co/kipEfjO1Jh B. HCQ https://t.co/6pleySVGNP 3. ‘COVID vaccines have 95% efficacy’ htt

@ivaningrad https://t.co/s2Awc2UGcq

@AshishKJha46 Dumb Mask shown below is rated to prevent viral transmission. Cloth and Surgical masks have no reliable efficacy (0-3%) https://t.co/Abb4rmi1Wx N95 masks do not reliably prevent viral transmission, filter 95% @ 3 microns. COVID is .125 m

@aquaresearcher マスクを調べていると、どうしてもこのあたりの論文の存在を無視できない。 メタ解析で効果なし https://t.co/rFk6Ad9zCe デンマークRCTでコロナに対して有意差なし https://t.co/PN3cVRkzjA 同解説 https://t.co/7IZ7uZCyac

@ABC Latest mask study: “The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate.” >>No reliable efficacy for cloth and surgical masks.<<< https://t.co/Abb4rmi1Wx

@R160016 @KQEDnews “The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate” https://t.co/Esp1mpbMyr

マスクの効果 デンマーク メモ

マスクの効果 デンマーク メモ

@mcbot_sm @jojomogo41 @l_m_p1 @JuliaHB1 https://t.co/bRoBsDlHqm Science disagrees with you.. This is one of the latest reports out.

@nozick_r @ignaciogs__ @ivancarrino @ZinClaudio https://t.co/oeADp7HSWB Si no entiendo mal, el barbijo no sirve para mierda. Lo sospeché desde un principio

@MHLWitter スペインの研究でもマスク着用と感染リスクの関連性は見られなかった https://t.co/s64Y9SWnjY デンマークでもマスクの効果は無かった https://t.co/ZWrkS1AQHI マスク着用は効果が無かったと言うイギリスとノルウェーの論文 https://t.co/QPOUICvvta

マスクマスク言うてる人や組織は、引用ツイートのツリーをよう見てみることや。 @JREast_official @MLIT_JAPAN @jimin_koho @mextjapan @MHLWitter @meti_NIPPON @seinenkyoku @joseikyoku @oonomotohiro

RT @Absolut_Boston: @chrislhayes Perhaps, and I'm just spit balling here, rational people read an actual random controlled trial of masks,…

@JanPMPeeters @Harry08429249 @rblommestijn https://t.co/61DBuUjfKT

RT @MakingC19Waves: デンマークでの6千ランダム比較試験 (RCT)でマスク着用者と非着用者はコロナ感染率に有意差がなかったです。https://t.co/2clHX8qt8i https://t.co/IhFQr65fZf

@hsom113 @sarabjustone @msabouri @gregggonsalves Sample: https://t.co/ZCGEL694mA https://t.co/VCpZa3Ydpt https://t.co/8IceHdZ0Og https://t.co/G2oBMPGwSg

@chrislhayes Perhaps, and I'm just spit balling here, rational people read an actual random controlled trial of masks, saw the evidence, and came to the same conclusions as the scientists who conducted the study & decided they were not a factor. https

@waxera @FiveThirtyEight And RCT's in the last two years have fairly conclusively proven they don't work. lol. But they still keep pushing the propaganda. https://t.co/ePKVyWj4Sh

@TwiddleeeeDee @Undertow_75 Try reading a study or twelve. https://t.co/ePKVyWj4Sh

@FiveThirtyEight This is misinformation. Do better https://t.co/ePKVyWj4Sh

@NAHoney3 @MLSmithTX @GovAbbott @BetoORourke @BlueActionBASCA The mask below is rated to prevent virus transmission. Cloth / Surgical mask 1.5% efficacy https://t.co/Abb4rmi1Wx N95 masks 8% efficacy https://t.co/AM8TPiD9SV Cloth / Surgical and N95 do

@aoyamayamato まずはこの論文を読んでからゼロベースで検討してほしい。 https://t.co/mEOFepYoI2

@NightShiftMD The mask show below is rated to prevent virus transmission. Cloth / Surgical mask ~1.5% efficacy https://t.co/Abb4rmi1Wx N95 mask ~8% efficacy https://t.co/AM8TPiD9SV Cloth, surgical and N95 masks do not reliably prevent virus transmission

RT @RobertFritzenk2: The respirator mask shown below is effective at preventing virus transmission. ⚠️0-1.5% Cloth and Surgical masks have…

RT @RobertFritzenk2: The respirator mask shown below is effective at preventing virus transmission. ⚠️0-1.5% Cloth and Surgical masks have…

The respirator mask shown below is effective at preventing virus transmission. ⚠️0-1.5% Cloth and Surgical masks have no reliable efficacy https://t.co/Abb4rmi1Wx ⚠️7-8% N95 masks have only 8% efficacy https://t.co/AM8TPiD9SV https://t.co/qkoN8IEQJv

@AndrewPrine1 @2Genervter The mask shown below (without filters attached) is rated to prevent virus transmission. These mask types are unreliable: Cloth/surgical mask have 1.5% efficacy https://t.co/Abb4rmi1Wx N95 masks have ~8% efficacy https://t.co/A

@life_lover77 @jedijoecanuck ✅No significant difference✅ in catching #COVID19 between masked & unmasked populations in non-medical settings From #DANMASK, a randomized controlled trial (gold standard), w/4,862 ppl. https://t.co/Q67dLFQEdV

@shmp901 大真面目に論文も。 https://t.co/mEOFepYoI2

@m_l_pop @M2kf20072021 そもそも、マスクがコロナ予防に効果があるなんて言える訳がないと思うんだけど。 https://t.co/mEOFepYoI2

@sate_tv 有効性を否定するデータなら、デンマークRCTで十分。 https://t.co/mEOFepYoI2 　又、今のオミクロンは医師が不適切な治療をしない限り死なない。 #コロナを5類以下に してマスク非推奨で終わり。

@livedoornews 何故おとなしく「マスク非推奨」と言えないんだ？ 　エビデンスレベル最低の個人の見解レベルでしろと言うのか？ばかげている。 　この論文を読んでからガイドラインを作れ。 https://t.co/PN3cVRkzjA 日本語解説 https://t.co/7IZ7uZCyac

RT @5rHxIhQGQnnRSOe: @rcmnn00 @KonoBellYoko 無い物は無い。大人は良いが子供は十代まで顔から表情を学びます。子供には無理。 デンマークのマスク着用者におけるSARS-CoV-2感染を防ぐために、他の公衆衛生対策にマスク推奨を追加するこ…

@iamfoundinhim @Ford99717837 @JoLuehmann https://t.co/KJR5LLoGt2

@rcmnn00 @KonoBellYoko 無い物は無い。大人は良いが子供は十代まで顔から表情を学びます。子供には無理。 デンマークのマスク着用者におけるSARS-CoV-2感染を防ぐために、他の公衆衛生対策にマスク推奨を追加することの有効性RCT：有用性ないどころが家庭内では逆効果　２０２０年 https://t.co/P7ISZG7VuR

RT @RobertFritzenk2: ‘Party of Science’ — They trusted Fauci and was fooled out of their socks: -ivermectin https://t.co/kipEfjO1Jh -HC…

@DylanByers https://t.co/Ez0OpMt7pZ

RT @RobertFritzenk2: The mask (shown below without filters) is effective against virus transmission. That cloth / paper crap on your face…

The mask (shown below without filters) is effective against virus transmission. That cloth / paper crap on your face does not provide any reliable virus protection. Two studies confirm Cloth / Surgical https://t.co/Abb4rmi1Wx N95 https://t.co/AM8

‘Party of Science’ — They trusted Fauci and was fooled out of their socks: -ivermectin https://t.co/kipEfjO1Jh -HCQ https://t.co/6pleySVGNP -mask efficacy https://t.co/Abb4rmi1Wx -94% efficacy of COVID Vaccines https://t.co/uHix5dVrwa https://t.co/mF

@drkaracenk @HLTKN Maskenin korumadığına dair 2 RCT kaynak linkleriyle paylaşıyorum. Siz de koruduğuna dair RCT paylaşır mısınız?Modelleme değil koruduğuna dair RCT rica ediyorum. Pandemi ise 2020’de bitmişti tüm veriler bu yönde bilgiselde var. https://t.

@WinWar35079179 @awatarius @RepMTG Hey here you buddy, this one’s been peer reviewed by actual scientists https://t.co/eaGTSuhy6E https://t.co/a4My323Lrx

RT @megcrane8: Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: The recommendation to…

RT @megcrane8: Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask…

RT @megcrane8: Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: The recommendation to…

RT @megcrane8: Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask…

@Sankei_news 専門家連中はこれくらい論文を読んでいるよな（ｗ 　どうしてマスクが効くなんて盲信が出来るか意味わからん。 https://t.co/mEOFepYoI2

Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers The recommendation to wear masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate h

@kumagai_chiba これを読んでから政策をして下さい。マスクはコロナ予防効果なし。 https://t.co/mEOFepYoI2

Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: The recommendation to wear a surgical mask outside the home did not reduce the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in mask wearers https://t.co/VzN9mn8b0L

RT @AILazzarino: Lo studio migliore fino ad oggi condotto sulle #mascherine per la prevenzione del #COVID19 non ha escluso un effetto oppos…

RT @dermapython: @xjpvY2qxQk2tdoL https://t.co/Fo5qi88mr6 私が根拠にしているのはこのRCTです。マスクを着けることが飛沫を減らしたりウイルス量を減らすのはその通りだと思いますよ。でも、感染者数が変わらなければ意味無いです…

RT @shiharasiri: #アンケート 問　次のマスクに関する研究論文（いわゆるデンマークＲＣＴ試験）をご存じですか？ https://t.co/PN3cVRkzjA 日本語解説 https://t.co/7IZ7uZCyac

@Christi74006290 @1979HAB @maggiemurphy67 @Anthony__Koch @FedsForFreedom ✅No significant difference✅ in catching #COVID19 between masked & unmasked populations in non-medical settings From #DANMASK, a randomized controlled trial (gold standard), w/4,8

RT @shiharasiri: @hiroshitokyo46 政府のコロナ対策を過剰と思う皆さんに次のアンケートに協力お願いします。 　このマスクに関する有名な論文をご存知でしょうか。 https://t.co/mEOFepYoI2

RT @W_van_Dungen: 👇 https://t.co/GV4zic5VKX

👇 https://t.co/GV4zic5VKX

RT @HalukVAHABOLU: Toplumsal maske yasağının koruyucu etkisi yoktur https://t.co/HBkqZuOpxc https://t.co/1iaIiGhegi https://t.co/wVkIS62Pwk…

RT @KanAugust: 5/ コロナ（COVID19）に関しても去年デンマークで大きなテストが行われましたが、 「予防に効果があると言えない」 が結論です。 https://t.co/WHEU4BFJAn https://t.co/hENjjAwnKC

@AILazzarino @SignorErnesto @giovannilandoni @ricpuglisi chiudo con questo e gli altri cercateli tu. coglione https://t.co/FnXEGva1C9

RT @assaf19761: עוד מחקר שמוכיח שההמלצה לעטות מסיכה אינה מפחיתה את שיעור ההיארעות של הדבקה בקורונה. האם זה יפריע להם לחייב את הציבור לעטות…

@J_Radetzky @fabio_sona @sbruffino Lo trova qui

עוד מחקר שמוכיח שההמלצה לעטות מסיכה אינה מפחיתה את שיעור ההיארעות של הדבקה בקורונה. האם זה יפריע להם לחייב את הציבור לעטות מסכה שוב בהמשך? כנראה לא. https://t.co/xacybHaBgc https://t.co/AVqTv4Jjys

@ilcecc88 @ms_incred @bndprtkb @ZenperZen @sbruffino Ecco.

@xjpvY2qxQk2tdoL https://t.co/Fo5qi88mr6 私が根拠にしているのはこのRCTです。マスクを着けることが飛沫を減らしたりウイルス量を減らすのはその通りだと思いますよ。でも、感染者数が変わらなければ意味無いですよね。

RT @HalukVAHABOLU: Toplumsal maske yasağının koruyucu etkisi yoktur https://t.co/HBkqZuOpxc https://t.co/1iaIiGhegi https://t.co/wVkIS62Pwk…

Lo studio migliore fino ad oggi condotto sulle #mascherine per la prevenzione del #COVID19 non ha escluso un effetto opposto a quello desiderato, in quanto l’intervallo di confidenza della stima include il valore nullo e non esclude un +20% di rischio. ht

RT @HalukVAHABOLU: Toplumsal maske yasağının koruyucu etkisi yoktur https://t.co/HBkqZuOpxc https://t.co/1iaIiGhegi https://t.co/wVkIS62Pwk…

Toplumsal maske yasağının koruyucu etkisi yoktur https://t.co/HBkqZuOpxc https://t.co/1iaIiGhegi https://t.co/wVkIS62Pwk https://t.co/GkDoxxkfrr

@EWoodhouse7 For people who forget : good link: https://t.co/oxIoQ3bcyc

RT @shiharasiri: #アンケート 問　次のマスクに関する研究論文（いわゆるデンマークＲＣＴ試験）をご存じですか？ https://t.co/PN3cVRkzjA 日本語解説 https://t.co/7IZ7uZCyac

ご存知でした_(:3 」∠)_ 回答者はマスクに興味がある人に偏ってそうなのに、それでも7割知らんのね。

RT @shiharasiri: #アンケート 問　次のマスクに関する研究論文（いわゆるデンマークＲＣＴ試験）をご存じですか？ https://t.co/PN3cVRkzjA 日本語解説 https://t.co/7IZ7uZCyac