@victorfoss4 @offgriddesigner @piersmorgan No going with the narrative (which one do you choose as they claimed both) is crazy. Effective? That's a bit NOPE. https://t.co/BGL2RAM7VR
RT @mama_melaleuca: 内閣官房 新型コロナウイルス感染症対策 マスクの効果 マスクは布やウレタンよりも 不織布の方が効果が高いことが示されています すき間のないよう顔にフィットさせ 正しくご利用ください マスク着用の主な目的は 👉会話や咳による飛沫の飛散や吸…
@EpiEllie Have some research which concludes Masks Do NOT Work https://t.co/Tfdkj7M7qe
@jaxxdragonan @Dcatz77 @EpiEllie Explain the charts. Why does the effective mitigation not show up? Here is the study. https://t.co/sRAD38AqR3
@LouisISHR @penpenpdn イベルメクチンは、世界でも多くの論文が出ており、それを知らないはずはないんですがね。 マスクの論文もたくさんありますが、僕はこれが一番わかりやすいと思います。 https://t.co/oZLKLJf5yh 時間が経っているとはいえ、トップエビデンスですから。 マスクをつけてもコロナは流行った。
@marsupilamima2 @DocArnica https://t.co/yGN4g4I4iP Tout le monde sait maintenant que les masques ne servent à rien.
@BonCitoyenJP Conclusion en anglais, çà ira ? https://t.co/w7CiTAHuRK https://t.co/TlR8v0bKM8
@scott_squires @DebSwift2 Maybe you should study the science, and find some common sense. https://t.co/bPeNlF7KV5
@scott_squires Follow the science and FU too. https://t.co/bPeNlF7KV5
@OXHarryH1 @JeromeAdamsMD I tend to think that they are effective (minimally) in reducing viral load. However, what is highly suspect is that every study showing they are ineffective on viral mitigation, or COVID (hundreds from last decade) is being censo
@Chakraborty_UNC @OWHnews @CHRISBURBACH 3 There are endless mask studies, even b4 C19 Double thick cloth masks +a filter "see no statistically significant effect for cloth masks" https://t.co/3bh5NADsGX Surgical randomized controlled trial showed a p val
@Olympus2021 Lo encontré https://t.co/FMeHRjg376
Y "otroestudio" https://t.co/FMeHRjg376
Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial https://t.co/2IadIRVMBp
@politicomedico @toadmeister He doesn't want you to. Here is a Danish study that shows they are effective https://t.co/zKgeLWLePh
@toadmeister Danish study finds them effective https://t.co/zKgeLWLePh
@koenig2396 @aswaldschrat @ScepticalW80418 @Haintz_Media Herrlich. Erstens, Sie sind offensichtlich nicht gebildet genug zu wissen, wie man zitiert. Zweitens, in besagter Veröffentlichung wird eben nicht die Wirksamkeit von FFP2 Masken angesprochen, sonder
@Xyz_Apologia @benjmohikan @red24789 @Eureca_new @SaiyanBio Ça ne sert à rien nom de dieu! https://t.co/QZ0aMAtNdd
RT @Eureca_new: @SaiyanBio Ils ne portent pas de masques car cela a aucune efficacité contre les virus ! https://t.co/asWgPDbvno https://…
@CaroCriDuCoeur @SaiyanBio Absolument pas ! La raison c est tout simplement que ça sert à rien ! https://t.co/asWgPDbvno https://t.co/kpgxVd65J5 https://t.co/pWde0YSJAW
@JosianeGUILLEM1 @SaiyanBio Posez vous la question pourquoi…. https://t.co/asWgPDbvno https://t.co/kpgxVd65J5 https://t.co/pWde0YSJAW
@boogerhunter @dellysambora @SaiyanBio “Plusieurs siècles de connaissances”…. Perdu en un instant quand les fabricants de masques pour le Covid on écrit sur les boites “ne protège pas des virus” 😂…. Les études l ont montré n fois …. : https://t.co/asWgPD
@boogerhunter @dellysambora @SaiyanBio Un peu de lecture … cela dit comme vous n avez jamais lu ce qu’il y a ecrit sur les boites de masques …. Cela risque d être un peu compliqué pour vous …. https://t.co/asWgPDbvno https://t.co/kpgxVd65J5 https://t.co/
@SaiyanBio Ils ne portent pas de masques car cela a aucune efficacité contre les virus ! https://t.co/asWgPDbvno https://t.co/kpgxVd65J5 https://t.co/pWde0YSJAW
@MicheleGardette @SaiyanBio La faute professionnelle c est de dire n’importe quoi ! https://t.co/asWgPDbvno https://t.co/kpgxVd65J5 https://t.co/pWde0YSJAW
@red24789 @EricLemaire @SaiyanBio Ah oui ? lesquelles ? La quasi totalité des études montrent l inefficacité du masque ! Bonne lecture vous semblez avoir du retard ! https://t.co/asWgPDbvno https://t.co/kpgxVd65J5 https://t.co/pWde0YSJAW
@Julbert_5G @Keldran @CoyoteSanctuary @joelgarcin @MingyarIshtari @france_soir Bande de naifs, même les masques vous y avez cru, les cobayes à muselières 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
RT @Real_King_Elvis: @observationpt @NototyrannyNOW I'll trust the science... https://t.co/S9unaM39gE Danish study on infective masks ht…
RT @sabhlok: Well said. In brief, masks CAUSE GREAT HARM, and do NO GOOD. Costs>>> benefits. Must be banned outright.
RT @Real_King_Elvis: @observationpt @NototyrannyNOW I'll trust the science... https://t.co/S9unaM39gE Danish study on infective masks ht…
Isto é ciência. Ciência de verdade. O que fizeram com a população brasileira foi um crime. E multar pessoas por não usarem um retalho de pano em seus rostos é simples manutenção de uma narrativa ridícula.
@drkerrynphelps Are you sure you're familiar with a evidence based approach? Did you use evidence instead of science intentionally to avoid looking foolish? https://t.co/wJq6P4uW4k
RT @sabhlok: Well said. In brief, masks CAUSE GREAT HARM, and do NO GOOD. Costs>>> benefits. Must be banned outright.
RT @Real_King_Elvis: @observationpt @NototyrannyNOW I'll trust the science... https://t.co/S9unaM39gE Danish study on infective masks ht…
RT @sabhlok: Well said. In brief, masks CAUSE GREAT HARM, and do NO GOOD. Costs>>> benefits. Must be banned outright.
RT @sabhlok: Well said. In brief, masks CAUSE GREAT HARM, and do NO GOOD. Costs>>> benefits. Must be banned outright.
Well said. In brief, masks CAUSE GREAT HARM, and do NO GOOD. Costs>>> benefits. Must be banned outright.
Well said. In brief, masks CAUSE GREAT HARM, and do NO GOOD. Costs>>> harms. Must be banned.
RT @Real_King_Elvis: @observationpt @NototyrannyNOW I'll trust the science... https://t.co/S9unaM39gE Danish study on infective masks ht…
@observationpt @NototyrannyNOW I'll trust the science... https://t.co/S9unaM39gE Danish study on infective masks https://t.co/72z6WKrHoP NSW study showing cloth masks increase infection https://t.co/t0cuouNSVK NSW Cloth mask study. https://t.co/iQ7Oe
@QuickToshi @FutoshiIwasa デンマークのRCT実験についての論文は、こちらです。 https://t.co/MPOqJkPoJg 「この調査結果から『マスク着用が感染防止に効果的ではない』と結論付ける事は出来ない」 と、結論付けております。
@PeteF175 @LeeRiches1 @goddeketal I did. I pulled various quotes from it, such as the one that talked about source control. Here's the full text link for you. https://t.co/gN2QzMefJh
@PeteF175 @LeeRiches1 @goddeketal I understand that when someone demonstrates conclusively that you're incorrect it's common to lash out at them. When you're ready to have an adult conversation about the study let me know. The results were compatible with
@Dr_Francisco_ Tem esse estudo sobre máscaras aqui > https://t.co/v9xRvO3JxZ
@gayraineydrops @IanCopeland5 HISTORICALLY Community Masking was Never recommended to stop 🛑 the transmission of influenza BUT magically it became important for SARS-CoV2 Flu and COVID 🦠 are the same size Care to explain? https://t.co/fIqe8wCtJJ
@haweausha @StaatsfernSehe @MrJonasDanner In dem Artikel werden jede Menge Studien verlinkt. Z.B. diese: https://t.co/tPbAodXGld Welche dieser Studien ist nachweislich falsch? Sie führen keine Belege an. Sie beschimpfen einfach wüst. Ist Ihnen die Gen-Spri
@SallyNeary1 @JeromeAdamsMD Or this one? https://t.co/y8GLFEWBgX
@Face4Audio @Jacquifrench27 @jimeekay @ClareCraigPath The most comprehensive randomised controlled trial undertaken confirmed that mask wearing is ineffective. https://t.co/Hez3L8vkac
@shrewddudescast @jvipondmd https://t.co/hm98kFT37c https://t.co/oanwOaqoEy https://t.co/tY8u9AXBXK I'm sure you will find reasons to dismiss these, there are plenty more. There are no easy answers, but I think you are more opposed to being told what to do
Wat een tijd was 2020, i was there😆 #covidiots
@VincentL57 @chronos83 @Sciences_Avenir https://t.co/QZ0aMAtNdd Et après cherchez les autres il y en a des dizaines et toutes ont le même résultat: pas de différence significative mesurable. C est à vous qui voulez imposer des trucs maltraitants aux gens
@JeromeAdamsMD @OrwellAcademy Funny how HISTORICALLY Community Masking was Never recommended to stop 🛑 the transmission of influenza BUT magically it became important for SARS-CoV2 Flu and COVID 🦠 are the same size Care to explain? https://t.co/fIqe8wCtJ
@CartlandDavid Lies and More Lies Here 👇 about MASKING 🙄😷 Once again POLITICAL PRESSURE DROVE PUBLIC HEALTH DECISIONS You’re sure of it https://t.co/fIqe8wD1zh
RT @Jikkyleaks: @RichardWWard1 @_untampered @FrancieNolan6 @VPrasadMDMPH @CDCMMWR @vkprasadlab RCT. No significant effect. Your turn. Plea…
RT @AlexBerenson: Link to abstract: https://t.co/oF9ZRCuyNG
@RichardWWard1 @_untampered @FrancieNolan6 @VPrasadMDMPH @CDCMMWR @vkprasadlab Actually if you don't know what statistical significance is you might just be wasting my time. Can you answer this please or are you just going to do the usual things to deflec
RT @Jikkyleaks: @RichardWWard1 @_untampered @FrancieNolan6 @VPrasadMDMPH @CDCMMWR @vkprasadlab RCT. No significant effect. Your turn. Plea…
@RichardWWard1 @_untampered @FrancieNolan6 @VPrasadMDMPH @CDCMMWR @vkprasadlab RCT. No significant effect. Your turn. Please show an RCT that demonstrates a beneficial effect of community masking. It should include the downstream consequences such as fear
@rock_laroche @JosephLemire198 @Vidoc_Ronaco @matpel22 T’as rien compris… https://t.co/YlMv2qmMnO
@wendibloomenth1 @BarryESharp @richardzussman @bcndp @adriandix ⭐️Denmark RCT study (highest caliber of research) on mask universal masking for Covid, “Recommendation to wear a surgical mask when outside the home among others did not reduce incident SARS
RT @NicolasPichot6: 🔴Pr. Raoult / Etude danoise sur le port du masque 👉 Sur 3000 personnes qui ont porté le masque et 3000 personnes qui ne…
RT @NicolasPichot6: 🔴Pr. Raoult / Etude danoise sur le port du masque 👉 Sur 3000 personnes qui ont porté le masque et 3000 personnes qui ne…
RT @NicolasPichot6: 🔴Pr. Raoult / Etude danoise sur le port du masque 👉 Sur 3000 personnes qui ont porté le masque et 3000 personnes qui ne…
RT @NicolasPichot6: 🔴Pr. Raoult / Etude danoise sur le port du masque 👉 Sur 3000 personnes qui ont porté le masque et 3000 personnes qui ne…
RT @NicolasPichot6: 🔴Pr. Raoult / Etude danoise sur le port du masque 👉 Sur 3000 personnes qui ont porté le masque et 3000 personnes qui ne…
@Su15100307 @lisa_iannattone ahhh, thank you for providing actual links and studies. Most of them have been either debunked or have some serious issues. For example "supply of 50 surgical masks" (https://t.co/bvIW6PneZe) is meaningless cause surgical masks
@GlobalNational It's OK, masks work only a little bit (10%) to protect others agains your illness and only if you have symptoms, otherwhise useless with side effects. https://t.co/sMwKbFKmcf
@TildaMoo @LewisSchaffer @ailsybabe @LozzaFox @GBNEWS @MarkSteynOnline @LizKershawDJ @beverleyturner @Ofcom The published study contained within the article? 🫢https://t.co/r1mH31kJ4N
Waiting for the Cat to reply.