RT @trishgreenhalgh: 37.RCTs Let’s look at the other large community-based RCT of masks in covid-19. The *big Danish mask trial* became one…
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 37.RCTs Let’s look at the other large community-based RCT of masks in covid-19. The *big Danish mask trial* became one…
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 37.RCTs Let’s look at the other large community-based RCT of masks in covid-19. The *big Danish mask trial* became one…
RT @TravisNelitons: @jonlevyBU Please stop clowning, clown.
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 37.RCTs Let’s look at the other large community-based RCT of masks in covid-19. The *big Danish mask trial* became one…
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
Masks don't work but O2 does. Set your lungs free and take off the mask.
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 37.RCTs Let’s look at the other large community-based RCT of masks in covid-19. The *big Danish mask trial* became one…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 37.RCTs Let’s look at the other large community-based RCT of masks in covid-19. The *big Danish mask trial* became one…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 37.RCTs Let’s look at the other large community-based RCT of masks in covid-19. The *big Danish mask trial* became one…
37.RCTs Let’s look at the other large community-based RCT of masks in covid-19. The *big Danish mask trial* became one of the most talked-about RCTs in the pandemic. Its main finding was negative (no significant impact of masks compared to no masks). http
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
The Denmark study was conducted in spring of 2020 and published in March 2021. When it was published, it caused a lot of controversy and many people pointed out flaws... https://t.co/xx2Yi5IJNT
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
RT @TravisNelitons: @jonlevyBU @LizHighleyman So dumb, please stop.
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
RT @themarketswork: Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NO…
Odd how every major study - including ones that set out to prove masks worked - came to the conclusion that masks do NOT alter Covid transmission outcomes. https://t.co/VXxDhwVe3O https://t.co/cV6ZZwvKnz https://t.co/3Dmu5ko3K4
@RWMaloneMD Check out what I found from the "best" COVID mask trials. Maskers probably had less COVID because they went out / socialised less ... https://t.co/anUyZxpy3D https://t.co/QDaBmxyIKE
@the_apex_dawn @Alice_636 @ClaudeR7 @Golfnest2019 Une nième étude RCT a, encore, conclu que; "no statistically significant benefit of wearing a face mask." https://t.co/altlYrdtFu
@ScottAdamsSays See how easy it is to outdo the "experts" who don't even bother to examine the studies they reference: https://t.co/anUyZxpy3D
@suzi_k123 Check out this other study that had statistically insignificant reduction in COVID infections. A large part of mask users reported decreased physical activity, which could be the actual reason for lower infections, instead of mask's protection:
RT @NicolasPichot6: 🔴Pr. Raoult / Etude danoise sur le port du masque 👉 Sur 3000 personnes qui ont porté le masque et 3000 personnes qui ne…
@hyxx_or @astynis @NJWEB1 @C_A_Gustave @lemondeen2052 https://t.co/cnxBQZpZIt Mais t'as raison, crois Fauci avec ses 2 chaussettes sur le visage 😘
@Leonard36171753 @Flaviol55484146 @realpfigueiredo A conclusão está neste link. Se eu for usar só esse já acaba com porra dos argumentos do discípulo de nelipe feto. Se continuar com o mau-caratismo já vou bloquear : https://t.co/wXt7vxpAma
@clairerx4 @Tomtom92130 @CNEWS Et hop une étude prouvant l'inefficacité du masque: https://t.co/HMSrjtp3iO
@88Racer88 @What_the_lib @skidazzle @ABC Link to said study: https://t.co/dSKkhmDBEn
RT @yneb_on: Evidências da melhor qualidade possível mostram que máscaras NÃO evitam a transmissão viral. Pre-COVID: https://t.co/rN22VyrFI…
@TruePatriot8472 @ClownWorld_ 2022 Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers https://t.co/sBdZ8evhju
@BadMan4711 Als Erstes hat mich Studie aus Dänemark verunsichert https://t.co/4PKKdyaB0Y
@MartinKulldorff @JohnTierneyNYC ...which is no change from what we already knew. https://t.co/vxNTlaQsqZ
RT @KanAugust: 5/ コロナ(COVID19)に関しても去年デンマークで大きなテストが行われましたが、 「予防に効果があると言えない」 が結論です。 https://t.co/WHEU4BFJAn https://t.co/hENjjAwnKC
RT @HTchernobyl: les chercheurs avaient découvert que le risque d'être infecté était le même, que l'on porte un masque ou non https://t.co/…
@MagChange_73 @Francis4Hamelin Ensuite, il y a cette RCT qui a démontré que ceux qui portaient le masque avait 18% moins de chance d'être infecté. https://t.co/0oq1VU3x6i
RT @jonathanalbaba: /14 Remember when i said masks didn't work. They don't Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public H…
その中でマスクを着用している人たちに対し、『お前』呼ばわりを連発。 繰り返すが、コクラン論文では結論など出ておらず、これを以て勝ち誇るヤツは自ら『論文が読めない』ことを自己紹介するようなものだ。 反マスク連中は、同様にデンマークのRCTも持ち出す。 https://t.co/MGTCvHF6cv 2/5 https://t.co/rlhl6AmHUq
😉😉
@Canned_Dinosaur 僕としては以前、マスク着用者と非着用者では感染率に有意な差がなかったという研究データを取り上げて「マスクに意味なし!」と騒いでいた人が多かったので(マスクの飛沫拡散防止効果を無視)、反マスク論に対して慎重に向き合っています。 https://t.co/x4SdXNqafI
@fannylaurent27 @SaiyanBio Et encore, ... https://t.co/uWqP5lBTPM
No caso da Cochrane, os randomizados não comprovaram os observacionais. Não mesmo. Nada. Sabíamos há muito tempo, desde o Danmask, que não funcionava. (Ou se funcionasse, seria tão pouco que nem valeria a pena o esforço). https://t.co/vmTI60Vk4g
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/m6SoLOFaLV Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
RT @EsalaAntti: @merjah @jantunen_matti @lasleh @OksanenLotta @mediuutiset Ehkäpä koronaan kyllästynyt Vuoden Tiedetoimittaja 2021 @AMutane…
@6ixbuzztv This is a misleading post. 6buzz should share the link to the article an opinion of the article https://t.co/z6iWxZ0vMw
@James___Morris @LizHighleyman Full disclosure: I'm sure masks work, b/ there's a slew of epidemiological RCT studies that claim there's no evidence they work at population levels. It bugs the heck out of me b/c I don't have much to push back with. This is
@beowulf888 @MichaelSFuhrer @andyaschmidt Adherence in the 🇩🇰 study was high ~90%. Masks were used outside but not at home, so I think one could expect <50% reduction, which was their conclusion (with wide uncertainty) given the power of their study. S
masque en tissu : effet statistique non significatif -66% pour chirurgical => bien mieux que le seul essai randomisé évaluant protection perso (-45% à +25%) ! https://t.co/VzYTlTOWMS si effets aussi forts, pourquoi on le voit pas dans essais randomisé
@schmittpaula Qualquer semi-letrado que tenha analisado a literatura da área teria concluído que máscaras servem apenas para poluir o planeta. É no que venho dizendo e publicando desde 2020. Aqui: https://t.co/A38G1hhXUh https://t.co/T9usUounXd
RT @takua_scientist: 「マスクの効果にRCTで有意差が出なかった」論文を教えていただきました。 読んでみたところ、「1人だけマスクしても十分に防げない」という趣旨でした。 「有意差無し」という言葉にミスリードされることなく、解像度高く読むことが大切。 ht…
@LizHighleyman More studies continued. Please, note, observational studies are as much an integral and valid part of EBM as RCTs. https://t.co/eAnvspxQhb https://t.co/PpuNyuDtvO https://t.co/AvnjkT9tqJ https://t.co/cF8VSTgnlX https://t.co/3wtJ4HylZ0
@TRyanGregory When will you stop? https://t.co/cN8AojCzat
@brunodcora I'm on it. Te comparto otros: 1. https://t.co/iAvK0c6SnM 2. https://t.co/DhH7r4qEqx 3. https://t.co/EqVygSXSJ8 4. https://t.co/hve7schsAf 5. https://t.co/Vnm2Ssmehj https://t.co/XcZCCFYpoo 6. https://t.co/yBxZ2zWa4Y 7. https://t.co/41RMEbmr9l 8
@MarcusFrey_KA @ves_x_1000 @Elisabe34922334 @reitschuster A Danish randomized controlled trial with 6000 participants, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, found no statistically significant effect of high-quality medical face masks against SARS-C
RT @john_bumblebee: En ik wil niet lullig doen... Of eigenlijk wel, ik wil heel lullig doen: de best uitgevoerde trial naar het effect van…
RT @hichachu: ただし、人口中の着用率が低く感染リ スクが比較的高い条件下(デンマーク)で実施されたランダム化比較試験では、着用者と非着用者の間で1か月間の感染リスクの差異は見出せず、自分が感染しないための効果が必ずしも十分でないとする知見もある[6]。 https…
RT @Awakend_Citizen: 数多の論文が根拠と言うのならその論文を示して下さい 私はマスクにウイルス感染症予防効果が認められなかったことを証明した研究を示します (英語サイトはブラウザの翻訳機能で読んでください) 1.デンマークRCT →COVID-19感…
@kozokozo54 @amanekuNa @3t5zSirepu68K4W @mooncave3 @kuratamagohan https://t.co/Q0AoWNsFq2 4862 completed the study. testing at 1 month and whenever symptoms compatible with COVID-19 つまり、4862人が研究デザインに沿って完了。 これが、お前がN数にはならんと言ってる2392人と2470人を足した数な。
RT @john_bumblebee: En ik wil niet lullig doen... Of eigenlijk wel, ik wil heel lullig doen: de best uitgevoerde trial naar het effect van…
En ik wil niet lullig doen... Of eigenlijk wel, ik wil heel lullig doen: de best uitgevoerde trial naar het effect van mondkapjes op de verspreiding van #SARSCoV-2 in de gemeenschap werd al in 2021 gepubliceerd. https://t.co/ygJznaM1wn