RT @Ussignur_: @claudiovelardi il recente studio danese (n.b. pubblicato dopo che sono state invertite le conclusioni nell'abstract; cmq l'…
@BernulliT @antonioantela @gattaca2titan La ciencia es más cabezona que cualquiera de vosotros. https://t.co/vqkhLeCklT https://t.co/pxlIRTpVTw https://t.co/3WBPMDWCNE
@jeremyphoward No statistically significant difference between medical masks & N95s: https://t.co/g8cAriqGkc No statistically significant difference between medical masks & wearing NO masks: https://t.co/mfbH92IXzy https://t.co/JrIcnFmJXS
@lweisenthal @kevinnbass @SeattleiteLeo Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 174, No 3 https:/
@zeynep Denmark had other good studies, too. https://t.co/9VSeb8iZcW
RT @F_Lonly19: 有意差なし という言葉はミスリードでもなんでもなく有意差がないというそのまんま 実は効果があるみたいな解説の方がミスリード
RT @rOHDeSCL01HhZPL: こんなに丁寧にconclusion書いているのにこれでもかってほどにねじに捻じ曲げて全くトンチンカンな妄想しちゃうのはこの時代に一体全体どの翻訳機を使ったのかメチャクチャ気になる。 https://t.co/Km8hVxtJhT
RT @KonoBellYoko: 左が論文のVisual Abstract 右がtakuna氏のまとめ 彼のまとめには ・実験時期が2020年春 ・マスク非着用者も他人との距離は保つ という重要な情報が削ぎ落とされており、結論も全く異なります この人の「解像度高く読…
有意差なし という言葉はミスリードでもなんでもなく有意差がないというそのまんま 実は効果があるみたいな解説の方がミスリード
RT @KonoBellYoko: 左が論文のVisual Abstract 右がtakuna氏のまとめ 彼のまとめには ・実験時期が2020年春 ・マスク非着用者も他人との距離は保つ という重要な情報が削ぎ落とされており、結論も全く異なります この人の「解像度高く読…
@lisa_iannattone Masks don't work. A mask study from Denmark was published. 6,000 people in the trial. 50% wore masks, 50% didn’t, randomly assigned. After one month the results showed no statistically significant difference in COVID infection rates. https
@azarcazm @inquirerdotnet @zacariansINQ https://t.co/QYs4WqzAVG https://t.co/U21xL521hB https://t.co/yKEjnYAUo4 there's a few... there are many more
RT @sanchezfabraDW: @jesusrbano IMO, there's no need of RCT, it's about common sense. Our job is and old one, based in trust and emphathy.…
@jesusrbano IMO, there's no need of RCT, it's about common sense. Our job is and old one, based in trust and emphathy. I want my patients to see my face and I want my immune system resilient. Otherwise we have the scary plague masks of s. XVII, that's not
@kevinnbass The DANMASK study showed essentially no harm, and surgical masks were numerically better at preventing disease (although the effect fell short of achieving statistical significance). https://t.co/OvZbFnzcOC
RT @inspiron29: @asuka_way @cpvaL178MqxloD3 @taka098765 @netouyo001 @m02154625 @MIKITO_777 マスクは感染予防効果があるというデータを置いときますね。 https://t.co/LgRCQK…
https://t.co/acgybzkV7p おさらい。 マスクの有効性についてのデンマークRCT。
@asuka_way @cpvaL178MqxloD3 @taka098765 @netouyo001 @m02154625 @MIKITO_777 マスクは感染予防効果があるというデータを置いときますね。 https://t.co/LgRCQKudZ8 https://t.co/YLxT5NBx58
@Longtimenoce @anthonyvclark20 @DailyLoud RCT study on universal masking for Covid. The study added, “to wear a surgical mask when outside the home among others did not reduce, at statistical significance, incident SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with no mas
RT @kylephoenix419: @HeyNurseKat @sassy_girl1000 @GiJane_007 @DrKellyVictory Hey I can play your asinine, idiotic game all day! I have real…
@br_cse_iitb @theliverdr @drcheruvarun @SonaliVaid @DrLahariya @DocVatsa @tanya_aggarwal1 @dpradhanbjp @agrawalmanindra Cochrane review mentioned by @br_cse_iitb: https://t.co/HcaLzQSntK Abaluck 2022 https://t.co/bNgahZ3Dpi Bundgaard https://t.co/2tedQS
@JeanOncheMuscle T'inquiètes pas mon teuteu, n'aie pas honte, t'es quand même un boss pour colporter de la merde, entre autres 😂😂😂 https://t.co/w1srbRQQOa
@kylephoenix419 @BRIANARNOPP @sassy_girl1000 @GiJane_007 @DrKellyVictory This you throwing insults?
@HeyNurseKat @sassy_girl1000 @GiJane_007 @DrKellyVictory Hey I can play your asinine, idiotic game all day! I have real facts to back up my claims and graphs that you cultists claim to be a meme: https://t.co/kKi5M4yEx0 https://t.co/B66ULGXIbH https://t
@kerpen @DrJBhattacharya They never worked the way the government assured us. https://t.co/WpnIEbl3IF
@ScottAdamsSays Eventually published in another journal much later: https://t.co/eqjn3RYDHQ
@jasmith_yorku Hello, I’m Rick and I can read: (many other such documents). https://t.co/e7v9AWSPCZ
RT @shiharasiri: @hayagyu このあたりの論文や統計を熟読して、それでもマスクに感染予防効果があると言うのかな? 特に「他人にうつさないマスク」の問題。有効と言う報告がまるでない。 https://t.co/t5IwM2LWEm
@asealion1052978 まあ、デンマークの試験は、 マスク着用習慣の無い地域(デンマーク)での試験は、マスク効果でなくて、 『マスク着用推奨がデンマークで効果あるのか』の試験ですね。 ➡推奨しても効果無し。 但し、推奨した通りマスクしてるかは確認せず、マスク有無は個人からの報告のみ。 https://t.co/Hr30KhSKYL
@hayagyu このあたりの論文や統計を熟読して、それでもマスクに感染予防効果があると言うのかな? 特に「他人にうつさないマスク」の問題。有効と言う報告がまるでない。 https://t.co/t5IwM2LWEm
@CallMeDave @TimRobbins1 https://t.co/YfejTEsR5b wearing a mask and confinement are useless https://t.co/YE8fLfdxuq.
@WalkerHenrySmi1 @GiveUsAQuid I'll trust science rather than your enraged howls of being exposed as a lying disinformation bot. Lol Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mas
Oftmals wird diese Studie aus Dänemark angeführt, die die Effeklosigkeit von Masken untermauern soll. https://t.co/K128ld8xVq
Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers : A Randomized Controlled Trial https://t.co/XpmZIv8Y9C
@AntunesCastro1 @Mmacedo_tweets Lol o problema de portugal é o politicamente correcto e defender interesses sem sequer refletir. https://t.co/CSQiJ1wQA5 Mas o que mais gostei foi que a vida útil de uma máscara cirúrgica supostamente são 2h mas no inicio
RT @Awakend_Citizen: 数多の論文が根拠と言うのならその論文を示して下さい 私はマスクにウイルス感染症予防効果が認められなかったことを証明した研究を示します (英語サイトはブラウザの翻訳機能で読んでください) 1.デンマークRCT →COVID-19感…
@spazi_ale91 @_Edo_ @Giulio92868091 @Ro_Berta_42 @imballoionico @mariateresacip No, infatti. però questo studio randomizzato dimostra che le mascherine non servono. Ora che fai, gara di rutti? https://t.co/KqTPkXuaVA
@spazi_ale91 @_Edo_ @Giulio92868091 @Ro_Berta_42 @imballoionico @mariateresacip Dai, sei un bambino piccolo. Torna al posto. https://t.co/KqTPkXuaVA
RT @Nakhasi_MD: This Danish study suggests that masks don't work. It's not that simple. Here is what you need to know: 1) Only half in the…
@madamclare1 @studiocorvo ↓これ以外にもコクランレビューでも有意差はありませんでした https://t.co/w33R01BsGR
ちゃんと論文読んでる? 周囲に感染者がいなくて、距離を取ってるという前提での調査だよ。バイアスかかりまくりじゃん! 「感染率が低く、ある程度の社会的距離があり、一般的なマスクの使用が一般的でないコミュニティでは、着用者の SARS-CoV-2 感染率が 50% 以上減少しませんでした」
@kimi_neri @sari12356 マスクにしがみつく理由がわからない。こっちは絶望的なくらいマスクが逆効果を示したビッグデータを見てマスクは禁止まで踏み込まないと判断した。 2022年以降にマスクがうまくいったという論文、NEJMのあれ以外で出してみろ。 https://t.co/t5IwM2LWEm
RT @ianmcdermottLSO: @TheWholeTruth13 @juneslater17 And… A Danish randomized controlled trial with 6000 participants, published in the Ann…
@TheWholeTruth13 @juneslater17 And… A Danish randomized controlled trial with 6000 participants, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine in November 2020, found no statistically significant effect of high-quality medical face masks against SARS-CoV-2
RT @BillSpadea: This one too Roman. https://t.co/tNYw32J4tE
RT @BillSpadea: This one too Roman. https://t.co/tNYw32J4tE
RT @BillSpadea: This one too Roman. https://t.co/tNYw32J4tE
@august_mk @Roman_Baber No. They don’t. Stop spreading misinformation creating a false sense of security for vulnerable people. https://t.co/tNYw32J4tE
RT @BillSpadea: This one too Roman. https://t.co/tNYw32J4tE
This one too Roman. https://t.co/tNYw32J4tE
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/H58ycg4m5O Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
@jonathanstea No statistically significant difference between medical masks & N95s: https://t.co/g8cAriqGkc No statistically significant difference between medical masks & wearing NO masks: https://t.co/mfbH92IXzy https://t.co/JrIcnFmJXS
@GreenScreen3r @JohnRuddick2 Holy sh#t you talk about studies and then link an opinion piece by àn unscientific cooker, lol. https://t.co/S9unaM2Br6 https://t.co/VUvPRDfHts https://t.co/72z6WKr9zh
RT @OPTICHRlS_PRIME: @ScooterScience Wrong again Ms. Pseudoscience! No statistically significant difference between medical masks & N95s:…
@ScooterScience Wrong again Ms. Pseudoscience! No statistically significant difference between medical masks & N95s: https://t.co/g8cAriqGkc No statistically significant difference between medical masks & wearing NO masks: https://t.co/mfb
@blueamb60790824 @Organic__Yuki @zBFctIQsb9MIfND マスク無効側はこういうデータを持っている。それと有効側の論文の問題点、機構的な問題点まで考慮したとき、少なくとも市中のマスクでは有効になりえないと判断している。 https://t.co/t5IwM2LWEm
@mamasaurusMeg @bmahonthatsit @snaxodus @ReduxxMag I only know of one randomized trial that had null results. But the study notes in the discussion that "Although the difference observed was not statistically significant, the 95% CIs are compatible with a
against their narrative. So let’s start: - Masks: 📍Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers : A Randomized Controlled Trial (2021) https://t.co/bpQa0iOTAa
@muka_jcptakada なぜマスクが妥当と考えるか? 対自分:ポジティブな報告もあるが、ネガティブな報告が多数。 対他人:めぼしい報告はない。 病院で要求するなら医療機器基準でマスクを評価しろ。 #マスクは未承認医療機器 https://t.co/t5IwM2LWEm
RT @filipe_rafaeli: Estudo randomizado das máscaras. Aqui o mais importante. 3.030 com máscaras. 2.994 sem. Usuários: 1.8% COVID. Não us…
RT @OhagiDaifuku1: @star_illy @studiocorvo @a_k_a_shinobi 周囲が殆どしていない状況で少数だけマスクしても効果無いみたいだから集団全体でしないとダメっぽい https://t.co/80MM10yxjd
RT @OhagiDaifuku1: @star_illy @studiocorvo @a_k_a_shinobi 周囲が殆どしていない状況で少数だけマスクしても効果無いみたいだから集団全体でしないとダメっぽい https://t.co/80MM10yxjd
RT @OhagiDaifuku1: @star_illy @studiocorvo @a_k_a_shinobi 周囲が殆どしていない状況で少数だけマスクしても効果無いみたいだから集団全体でしないとダメっぽい https://t.co/80MM10yxjd
@star_illy @studiocorvo @a_k_a_shinobi 周囲が殆どしていない状況で少数だけマスクしても効果無いみたいだから集団全体でしないとダメっぽい https://t.co/80MM10yxjd
@xxpedrosantosxx @itsngabxoxo @DoramaQueer @choquei Aqui um dos vários estudos controlados e randomizados (ECR) que mostram que não tem grandes diferenças na contaminação de pessoas com e sem máscaras. E eu não disse que intersexuais não existem, só disse
RT @filipe_rafaeli: Estudo randomizado das máscaras. Aqui o mais importante. 3.030 com máscaras. 2.994 sem. Usuários: 1.8% COVID. Não us…
RT @filipe_rafaeli: Estudo randomizado das máscaras. Aqui o mais importante. 3.030 com máscaras. 2.994 sem. Usuários: 1.8% COVID. Não us…
@Harvey16749281 @flaviogarag Cara, desse 2021 tem estudo mostrando sua ineficácia. Eu não sei se vc sabe, mas o estudo que fizeram tentando provar sua eficácia, foi feito em ratos kkkkkkk https://t.co/ssIUs2zehA
@Streitschuster @Ready__Room (7/4) Zeig mir bitte eine signifikante positive Wirkung der Maske. Auch frühere Kohortenstudien zeigten keine positive Wirkung. https://t.co/lg2wrJMDmR (ja ja, ich weiss schon, die Dänemark-Studie) Punkt für Bhakdi
@my_fc1 N95については、単独使用での所見であり、我々マスク着用派の論点は 『ユニバーサルマスキング』 …を想定しており、貴殿の指摘は失当である。 反マスク連中は、同様にデンマークのRCTも持ち出すが、これこそが『論文が読めない』何よりの証左。 https://t.co/MGTCvHF6cv 4/n
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/H58ycg4m5O Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
@Yashn37 @legros58033216 @ManuStrigaLev @kennedy_legacy @barriere_dr @AlbinMichel On traduit: LES MASQUES NE MARCHENT PAS. https://t.co/76GVJsVt4L Oui bon on le savait, depuis l'étude danoise https://t.co/wXNvBI9r3f et finlandaise https://t.co/nQBiaDiGDH
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/H58ycg4m5O Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/H58ycg4m5O Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/H58ycg4m5O Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/H58ycg4m5O Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Radonovich 2019: https://t.co/8DPzEsWoEj Alfelali 2020: https://t.co/6gm2bRJGpB Bundgaard 2021: https://t.co/LhQFPCz0nb Abaluck, 2022: h
@mattltsmith https://t.co/xxOM63feQk I’m not a leftist though, so I’m not bound by your political theatre.
@tanaryo1008 ? 数があればいいんですか?? エビデンスレベル大事っていってませんでしたか? https://t.co/a2Q05KBDui https://t.co/0lRKuP9coH
RT @yneb_on: The best evidence shows that masks and N95 are very poor in preventing viral transmission: Pre-COVID https://t.co/rN22VyrFIo…